David Prinosil has found the Tour difficult, recording 169–221 across 390 matches (43.3%). The numbers point to a player still building their Tour presence — a key area of opportunity going forward. Claimed 3 titles: Newport, Ostrava, Halle.
At Grand Slam level (Australian Open, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, US Open): David Prinosil has struggled at Grand Slam level: 23–35 (39.7%) in 58 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on Tour.
ATP Masters 1000 (Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo, Madrid, Rome, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): David Prinosil has struggled at Masters level: 12–27 (30.8%) in 39 matches. Improving at this level is the clearest path to a stronger overall record.
6 finals reached — won 3, lost 3 (solid 50% conversion) — consistently getting to finals and winning the majority is a hallmark of elite performers. 13 semifinals. 33 quarterfinals.
vs. Top 10: 9–41 (18.0%, 50 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record.
By format — best-of-five: 24–38 (38.7%); best-of-three: 145–183 (44.2%). Slightly stronger in three-set contests, though the five-set record is still respectable.
Peak season: 1996 — 26–29 (47.3%) from 55 matches. That year captures the ceiling of what David Prinosil can do when performing at their best and represents the standard to aim for.
