Hard Court Statistics Overview
Quentin Halys has found hard courts difficult, recording 40–73 across 113 matches (35.4%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar.
At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Quentin Halys has struggled at Grand Slam level on hard: 5–15 (25.0%) in 20 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on this surface.
ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): a positive 13–13 (50.0%) across 26 matches — winning above .500 at this level, week in week out, is a genuine sign of quality on hard.
4 quarterfinals on hard, including one run to the semifinal — regularly reaching that stage is a solid baseline, with the next step being to break through to the final rounds more often.
vs. Top 10 on hard: 1–12 (7.7%, 13 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.
By format on hard — best-of-five: 5–15 (25.0%); best-of-three: 35–58 (37.6%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance on hard.
Best season: 2026 — 13–14 (48.1%) from 27 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.
Recent Form 2026: 13–14 (48.1%) on hard. Last 10: W L L W L L L W L W — mixed results, some inconsistency in the current period.
Quentin Halys Hard Court Record by Year
| Year | W | L | Win% | Titles | Finals | SF | QF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 13 | 14 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7 | 16 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2024 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 9 | 13 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent Hard Court Matches
| Date | Result | Opponent | Tournament | Round | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Win | (101) Coleman Wong | Shanghai | R128 | 6-4 7-6(5) |
| 2026-10-03 | Loss | (10) Alex De Minaur | Beijing | R16 | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
| 2026-10-01 | Win | (35) Ignacio Buse | Beijing | R32 | 6-1 7-6(3) |
| 2026-09-26 | Loss | (102) Roman Safiullin | Hangzhou | R16 | 5-7 6-3 6-4 |
| 2026-09-18 | Loss | (5) Felix Auger-Aliassime | Davis Cup QLS R2: CAN vs FRA | RR | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 |
| 2026-09-03 | Loss | (2) Alexander Zverev | US Open | R64 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-3 |
| 2026-08-31 | Win | (82) Facundo Diaz Acosta | US Open | R128 | 6-4 7-5 6-7(7) 6-1 |
| 2026-08-26 | Loss | (109) Benjamin Bonzi | Winston-Salem | R32 | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
| 2026-08-16 | Loss | (8) Alex de Minaur | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | 1-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
| 2026-08-14 | Win | (71) Vit Kopriva | Cincinnati Masters | R128 | 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Quentin Halys
Quentin Halys Hard Court Stats & Match Results
Hard Court Statistics Overview
Quentin Halys has found hard courts difficult, recording 40–73 across 113 matches (35.4%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar.
At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Quentin Halys has struggled at Grand Slam level on hard: 5–15 (25.0%) in 20 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on this surface.
ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): a positive 13–13 (50.0%) across 26 matches — winning above .500 at this level, week in week out, is a genuine sign of quality on hard.
4 quarterfinals on hard, including one run to the semifinal — regularly reaching that stage is a solid baseline, with the next step being to break through to the final rounds more often.
vs. Top 10 on hard: 1–12 (7.7%, 13 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.
By format on hard — best-of-five: 5–15 (25.0%); best-of-three: 35–58 (37.6%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance on hard.
Best season: 2026 — 13–14 (48.1%) from 27 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.
Recent Form 2026: 13–14 (48.1%) on hard. Last 10: W L L W L L L W L W — mixed results, some inconsistency in the current period.
Last 10 Hard Matches
View All Matches ↗| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Wrk | Winner | Lrk | Loser | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Shanghai | Hard | R128 | 48 | 101 | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
| 2026-10-03 | Beijing | Hard | R16 | 10 | 50 | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
| 2026-10-01 | Beijing | Hard | R32 | 50 | 35 | 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
| 2026-09-26 | Hangzhou | Hard | R16 | 102 | 49 | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
| 2026-09-18 | Davis Cup QLS R2: CAN vs FRA | Hard | RR | 5 | 49 | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | ||
| 2026-09-03 | US Open | Hard | R64 | 2 | 52 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-3 | ||
| 2026-08-31 | US Open | Hard | R128 | 52 | 82 | 6-4 7-5 6-7(7) 6-1 | ||
| 2026-08-26 | Winston-Salem | Hard | R32 | 109 | 52 | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
| 2026-08-16 | Cincinnati Masters | Hard | R64 | 8 | 57 | 1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
| 2026-08-14 | Cincinnati Masters | Hard | R128 | 54 | 71 | 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Matches — Hard