Jiri Vesely has found hard courts difficult, recording 61–89 across 150 matches (40.7%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar. Claimed 2 titles on hard: Auckland, Pune.

At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Jiri Vesely has struggled at Grand Slam level on hard: 7–18 (28.0%) in 25 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on this surface.

ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Jiri Vesely has struggled at Masters level on hard: 7–16 (30.4%) in 23 matches. Improving at this level is the clearest path to a stronger overall record on this surface.

3 finals reached on hard — won 2, lost 1 (solid 67% conversion) — consistently getting to finals and winning the majority is a hallmark of elite performers on hard. 3 semifinals. 9 quarterfinals.

vs. Top 10 on hard: 1–9 (10.0%, 10 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.

By format on hard — best-of-five: 8–23 (25.8%); best-of-three: 53–66 (44.5%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance on hard.

Best season: 2020 — 6–3 (66.7%) from 9 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.