Jacob Fearnley has found hard courts difficult, recording 10–18 across 28 matches (35.7%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar.

At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Jacob Fearnley is 3–3 (50.0%) across 6 Grand Slam matches — below .500, though the elite draw depth at the Slams makes that a notoriously difficult barrier to crack.

ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Jacob Fearnley has struggled at Masters level on hard: 3–8 (27.3%) in 11 matches. Improving at this level is the clearest path to a stronger overall record on this surface.

vs. Top 10 on hard: 0–5 (0.0%, 5 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.

By format on hard — best-of-five: 3–3 (50.0%); best-of-three: 7–15 (31.8%). Significantly better in five-set matches — a strong physical profile on hard that tends to tell as matches and tournaments progress.

Best season: 2026 — 3–5 (37.5%) from 8 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.

Recent Form 2026: 3–5 (37.5%) on hard. Last 8: L L W W L L W L — mixed results, some inconsistency in the current period.