Frederic Fontang has found the Tour difficult, recording 28–60 across 88 matches (31.8%). The numbers point to a player still building their Tour presence — a key area of opportunity going forward. Claimed 1 title: Palermo.
At Grand Slam level (Australian Open, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, US Open): Frederic Fontang has struggled at Grand Slam level: 1–9 (10.0%) in 10 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on Tour.
ATP Masters 1000 (Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo, Madrid, Rome, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Frederic Fontang has struggled at Masters level: 1–8 (11.1%) in 9 matches. Improving at this level is the clearest path to a stronger overall record.
2 finals reached — won 1, lost 1 (solid 50% conversion) — consistently getting to finals and winning the majority is a hallmark of elite performers. 2 semifinals. 5 quarterfinals.
vs. Top 10: 0–4 (0.0%, 4 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record.
By format — best-of-five: 1–9 (10.0%); best-of-three: 27–51 (34.6%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance.
Best season: 1991 — 11–10 (52.4%) from 21 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the career continues to develop.