W-L: 2-8 (20.00%)

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
2015-02-02	Zagreb	Hard	R32	109	James Ward	228	Antonio Veic	6-2 6-4
2013-07-28	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R32	62	Daniel Gimeno-Traver	196	Antonio Veic	6-1 6-3
2013-07-22	Umag	Clay	R32	53	Viktor Troicki	172	Antonio Veic	7-6(6) 6-1
2013-07-08	Bastad	Clay	R32	216	Henri Laaksonen	181	Antonio Veic	5-7 6-1 6-1
2013-02-25	Acapulco	Clay	R32	4	David Ferrer	129	Antonio Veic	6-0 6-3
2013-02-04	Zagreb	Hard	R32	58	Robin Haase	126	Antonio Veic	2-6 6-3 6-3
2012-07-22	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R32	137	Antonio Veic	77	SLOBlaz Kavcic	6-1 6-2
2012-07-22	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R16	97	Lukas Rosol	137	Antonio Veic	6-3 5-7 6-3
2012-07-09	Umag	Clay	R32	71	SLOBlaz Kavcic	131	Antonio Veic	6-2 6-2
2012-04-30	Belgrade	Clay	R32	127	Antonio Veic	102	SLOBlaz Kavcic	6-1 6-1

Antonio Veic

W-L: 2-8 (20.00%)

Matches — Round: Round of 128

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
2015-02-02	Zagreb	Hard	R32	109	James Ward	228	Antonio Veic (WC)	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	71	3	1	57.9%	78.8%	50.0%	3/4
2013-07-28	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R32	62	Daniel Gimeno-Traver	196	Antonio Veic (Q)	6-1 6-3	H2H	3	59	4	0	57.1%	83.3%	72.2%	2/2
2013-07-22	Umag	Clay	R32	53	Viktor Troicki	172	Antonio Veic (WC)	7-6(6) 6-1	H2H	3	93	2	1	66.2%	67.4%	50.0%	2/4
2013-07-08	Bastad	Clay	R32	216	Henri Laaksonen (Q)	181	Antonio Veic (Q)	5-7 6-1 6-1	H2H	3	106	1	3	66.2%	68.1%	41.7%	1/5
2013-02-25	Acapulco	Clay	R32	4	David Ferrer (1)	129	Antonio Veic (LL)	6-0 6-3	H2H	3	67	0	0	60.4%	69.0%	78.9%	1/1
2013-02-04	Zagreb	Hard	R32	58	Robin Haase	126	Antonio Veic (WC)	2-6 6-3 6-3	H2H	3	99	15	3	54.8%	85.0%	51.5%	1/3
2012-07-22	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R16	97	Lukas Rosol	137	Antonio Veic (Q)	6-3 5-7 6-3	H2H	3	110	8	6	41.5%	66.7%	61.8%	6/9
2012-07-22	Kitzbuhel	Clay	R32	137	Antonio Veic (Q)	77	SLOBlaz Kavcic (8)	6-1 6-2	H2H	3	68	2	1	60.0%	70.4%	77.8%	1/1
2012-07-09	Umag	Clay	R32	71	SLOBlaz Kavcic	131	Antonio Veic	6-2 6-2	H2H	3	75	0	1	65.0%	73.1%	71.4%	0/1
2012-04-30	Belgrade	Clay	R32	127	Antonio Veic (Q)	102	SLOBlaz Kavcic	6-1 6-1	H2H	3	72	0	1	56.4%	90.9%	47.1%	1/2