W-L: 5-5 (50.00%)

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	R32	209	Paolo Cane	138	David Prinosil	7-6(6) 3-6 6-1
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	R16	209	Paolo Cane	13	MaliVai Washington	6-3 6-4
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	QF	59	Olivier Delaitre	209	Paolo Cane	6-4 6-4
1992-09-28	Palermo	Clay	R32	223	Paolo Cane	28	Andrei Medvedev	6-7(4) 6-3 6-3
1992-09-28	Palermo	Clay	R16	98	Horst Skoff	223	Paolo Cane	6-2 6-1
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	R16	206	Paolo Cane	112	Mark Koevermans	6-3 6-2
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	QF	58	Horst Skoff	206	Paolo Cane	7-6(5) 5-7 6-4
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	R32	206	Paolo Cane	424	Jose-Luis Aparisi	6-4 6-2
1992-06-08	Florence	Clay	R32	56	Renzo Furlan	206	Paolo Cane	6-1 6-4
1992-05-18	Bologna	Clay	R16	66	Franco Davin	111	Paolo Cane	6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-4

Paolo Cane

W-L: 5-5 (50.00%)

Matches in 1992

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	QF	59	Olivier Delaitre (7)	209	Paolo Cane (WC)	6-4 6-4	H2H	3	68	12	4	47.0%	87.1%	57.1%	2/2
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	R16	209	Paolo Cane (WC)	13	MaliVai Washington (1)	6-3 6-4	H2H	3	80	3	2	62.7%	78.1%	52.6%	2/3
1992-10-12	Bolzano	Carpet	R32	209	Paolo Cane (WC)	138	David Prinosil	7-6(6) 3-6 6-1	H2H	3	109	13	5	57.3%	85.1%	62.9%	0/1
1992-09-28	Palermo	Clay	R16	98	Horst Skoff	223	Paolo Cane (WC)	6-2 6-1	H2H	3	81	6	3	50.0%	78.3%	65.2%	4/4
1992-09-28	Palermo	Clay	R32	223	Paolo Cane (WC)	28	Andrei Medvedev (6)	6-7(4) 6-3 6-3	H2H	3	133	3	2	56.9%	67.2%	56.8%	6/8
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	QF	58	Horst Skoff (4)	206	Paolo Cane (WC)	7-6(5) 5-7 6-4	H2H	3	170	1	7	59.8%	72.9%	46.8%	10/14
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	R16	206	Paolo Cane (WC)	112	Mark Koevermans	6-3 6-2	H2H	3	71	5	1	62.7%	84.4%	57.9%	1/1
1992-06-15	Genova	Clay	R32	206	Paolo Cane (WC)	424	Jose-Luis Aparisi (Q)	6-4 6-2	H2H	3	70	6	1	50.9%	81.5%	65.4%	1/1
1992-06-08	Florence	Clay	R32	56	Renzo Furlan	206	Paolo Cane	6-1 6-4	H2H	3	72	0	0	64.7%	72.7%	66.7%	2/3
1992-05-18	Bologna	Clay	R16	66	Franco Davin	111	Paolo Cane (WC)	6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-4	H2H	3	192	1	2	71.8%	62.9%	45.7%	7/10