Lars Rehmann

Hard Clay Grass

Showing last 10 matchesView All Matches ↗

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
1996-04-15	Tokyo	Hard	R64	44	Jakob Hlasek	238	Lars Rehmann	7-6(4) 3-6 3-0 RET
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	F	82	Greg Rusedski	116	Lars Rehmann	6-4 3-1 RET
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	SF	116	Lars Rehmann	239	Bing Pan	6-3 6-2
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	R32	116	Lars Rehmann	584	Eui-Jong Chang	6-3 6-1
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	QF	116	Lars Rehmann	108	Paul Wekesa	6-3 6-4
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	R16	116	Lars Rehmann	54	Martin Damm	6-2 6-4
1995-04-17	Hong Kong	Hard	R32	86	Jan Apell	116	Lars Rehmann	6-4 6-2
1995-04-10	Tokyo Outdoor	Hard	R64	177	Lionel Barthez	116	Lars Rehmann	7-6(3) 6-3
1995-02-13	Memphis	Hard	R16	51	Arnaud Boetsch	105	Lars Rehmann	2-6 7-6(6) 7-5
1995-02-13	Memphis	Hard	R32	105	Lars Rehmann	20	Jacco Eltingh	7-6(2) 4-6 6-2

W-L: 5-5 (50.00%)

Matches on Hard

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
1996-04-15	Tokyo	Hard	R64	44	Jakob Hlasek (12)	238	Lars Rehmann (Q)	7-6(4) 3-6 3-0 RET	H2H	3	94	9	3	69.4%	71.2%	53.8%	7/9
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	F	82	Greg Rusedski (8)	116	Lars Rehmann	6-4 3-1 RET	H2H	3	68	7	4	61.5%	91.7%	40.0%	0/0
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	SF	116	Lars Rehmann	239	Bing Pan (Q)	6-3 6-2	H2H	3	64	1	1	75.9%	70.7%	61.5%	0/1
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	QF	116	Lars Rehmann	108	Paul Wekesa	6-3 6-4	H2H	3	71	2	1	75.4%	67.4%	86.7%	2/2
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	R16	116	Lars Rehmann	54	Martin Damm (2)	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	76	4	1	66.1%	70.7%	52.4%	8/9
1995-04-24	Seoul	Hard	R32	116	Lars Rehmann	584	Eui-Jong Chang (WC)	6-3 6-1	H2H	3	67	0	2	60.8%	77.4%	55.0%	1/1
1995-04-17	Hong Kong	Hard	R32	86	Jan Apell	116	Lars Rehmann	6-4 6-2	H2H	3	74	3	4	63.8%	83.8%	42.9%	3/3
1995-04-10	Tokyo Outdoor	Hard	R64	177	Lionel Barthez	116	Lars Rehmann	7-6(3) 6-3	H2H	3	98	3	4	67.2%	75.6%	59.1%	1/2
1995-02-13	Memphis	Hard	R16	51	Arnaud Boetsch (13)	105	Lars Rehmann	2-6 7-6(6) 7-5	H2H	3	115	9	5	55.7%	77.8%	41.9%	2/6
1995-02-13	Memphis	Hard	R32	105	Lars Rehmann	20	Jacco Eltingh (4)	7-6(2) 4-6 6-2	H2H	3	108	7	2	68.6%	81.4%	51.9%	1/3