W-L: 1-9 (10.00%)

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
1995-10-30	Paris Masters	Carpet	R64	49	Mark Woodforde	166	Jim Grabb	6-1 6-3
1995-10-09	Tel Aviv	Hard	R32	148	Radomir Vasek	159	Jim Grabb	6-2 1-6 7-6(4)
1995-09-11	Bordeaux	Hard	R32	48	Greg Rusedski	156	Jim Grabb	6-3 3-6 6-1
1995-08-28	US Open	Hard	R128	73	Kenneth Carlsen	136	Jim Grabb	6-7(6) 7-6(1) 6-2 3-6 6-2
1995-08-14	New Haven	Hard	R64	71	Byron Black	129	Jim Grabb	6-1 6-2
1995-08-07	Cincinnati Masters	Hard	R64	53	Patrick McEnroe	123	Jim Grabb	6-2 6-3
1995-07-31	Los Angeles	Hard	R16	7	Goran Ivanisevic	111	Jim Grabb	6-4 6-2
1995-07-31	Los Angeles	Hard	R32	111	Jim Grabb	124	Mark Petchey	6-2 6-4
1995-07-24	Canada Masters	Hard	R64	46	Aaron Krickstein	106	Jim Grabb	6-4 6-4
1995-07-17	Washington	Hard	R64	63	Martin Damm	97	Jim Grabb	6-2 4-6 6-3

Jim Grabb

W-L: 1-9 (10.00%)

Matches in 1995

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
1995-10-30	Paris Masters	Carpet	R64	49	Mark Woodforde	166	Jim Grabb (Q)	6-1 6-3	H2H	3	71	1	3	53.2%	80.0%	54.5%	4/5
1995-10-09	Tel Aviv	Hard	R32	148	Radomir Vasek	159	Jim Grabb	6-2 1-6 7-6(4)	H2H	3	128	1	10	45.6%	78.0%	46.9%	5/9
1995-09-11	Bordeaux	Hard	R32	48	Greg Rusedski (4)	156	Jim Grabb	6-3 3-6 6-1	H2H	3	92	4	3	61.6%	84.4%	53.6%	4/5
1995-08-28	US Open	Hard	R128	73	Kenneth Carlsen	136	Jim Grabb	6-7(6) 7-6(1) 6-2 3-6 6-2	H2H	5	-	9	8	47.5%	75.3%	61.2%	4/7
1995-08-14	New Haven	Hard	R64	71	Byron Black	129	Jim Grabb	6-1 6-2	H2H	3	68	0	3	50.0%	68.2%	68.2%	3/4
1995-08-07	Cincinnati Masters	Hard	R64	53	Patrick McEnroe	123	Jim Grabb (Q)	6-2 6-3	H2H	3	72	1	3	72.4%	71.4%	43.8%	2/3
1995-07-31	Los Angeles	Hard	R16	7	Goran Ivanisevic (1)	111	Jim Grabb	6-4 6-2	H2H	3	81	5	1	49.1%	76.9%	48.1%	4/6
1995-07-31	Los Angeles	Hard	R32	111	Jim Grabb	124	Mark Petchey	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	86	1	1	64.3%	69.4%	75.0%	3/3
1995-07-24	Canada Masters	Hard	R64	46	Aaron Krickstein	106	Jim Grabb	6-4 6-4	H2H	3	75	0	1	63.2%	77.8%	76.2%	0/0
1995-07-17	Washington	Hard	R64	63	Martin Damm (12)	97	Jim Grabb	6-2 4-6 6-3	H2H	3	122	10	2	54.1%	69.8%	55.6%	8/10