Site logo

Hard Court Statistics Overview

Jan-Lennard Struff has found hard courts difficult, recording 133–163 across 296 matches (44.9%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar.

At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Jan-Lennard Struff has struggled at Grand Slam level on hard: 12–23 (34.3%) in 35 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on this surface.

ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Jan-Lennard Struff is 28–38 (42.4%) across 66 Masters matches — below .500 in the Tour's deepest fields. Lifting that record here would unlock better results across the whole hard swing.

8 semifinals on hard without yet reaching a final — consistent deep runs that show the ability to string together wins across a full draw, with the step to the final still to come. 20 quarterfinals adds further depth to that picture.

vs. Top 10 on hard: 7–28 (20.0%, 35 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.

By format on hard — best-of-five: 12–25 (32.4%); best-of-three: 121–138 (46.7%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance on hard.

Best season: 2020 — 14–12 (53.8%) from 26 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.

Recent Form 2026: 5–10 (33.3%) on hard. Last 10: L L L L W L W L W L — mixed results, some inconsistency in the current period.

Jan-Lennard Struff Hard Court Record by Year

YearWLWin%TitlesFinalsSFQF
202651033.3%0000
202591340.9%0002
202491439.1%0000
202361037.5%0012
20227846.7%0001
2021141942.4%0022
2020141253.8%0002
2019181948.6%0012
2018131448.1%0002
2017161551.6%0023
20167943.8%0001
20155935.7%0000
20149852.9%0023
20131325.0%0000

Recent Hard Court Matches

DateResultOpponentTournamentRoundScore
2026-10-03Loss(6) Daniil MedvedevBeijingR166-4 6-3
2026-09-30Win(52) Thiago Agustin TiranteBeijingR326-1 6-4
2026-09-03Loss(25) Francisco CerundoloUS OpenR645-7 7-5 4-6 6-2 6-3
2026-09-01Win(77) Camilo Ugo CarabelliUS OpenR1286-4 6-3 6-3
2026-08-16Loss(29) Alejandro TabiloCincinnati MastersR646-3 6-4
2026-08-14Win(56) Roman Andres BurruchagaCincinnati MastersR1287-6(4) 2-6 6-3
2026-08-04Loss(41) Alex MichelsenCanada MastersR1286-1 3-6 6-1
2026-03-19Loss(272) Darwin BlanchMiami MastersR1286-3 3-6 6-3
2026-03-04Loss(47) Zizou BergsIndian Wells MastersR1286-3 6-4
2026-02-24Loss(10) Alexander BublikDubaiR326-3 6-4
🇩🇪

Jan-Lennard Struff

Jan-Lennard Struff Hard Court Stats & Match Results

Hard Court Statistics Overview

Jan-Lennard Struff has found hard courts difficult, recording 133–163 across 296 matches (44.9%). The numbers point to a surface that has not consistently suited the game — a key area of opportunity on the calendar.

At Grand Slam level (Australian Open & US Open): Jan-Lennard Struff has struggled at Grand Slam level on hard: 12–23 (34.3%) in 35 matches. The best-of-five format and elite fields make this the toughest benchmark on this surface.

ATP Masters 1000 on hard (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Jan-Lennard Struff is 28–38 (42.4%) across 66 Masters matches — below .500 in the Tour's deepest fields. Lifting that record here would unlock better results across the whole hard swing.

8 semifinals on hard without yet reaching a final — consistent deep runs that show the ability to string together wins across a full draw, with the step to the final still to come. 20 quarterfinals adds further depth to that picture.

vs. Top 10 on hard: 7–28 (20.0%, 35 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling on hard; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record here.

By format on hard — best-of-five: 12–25 (32.4%); best-of-three: 121–138 (46.7%). Markedly stronger in three-set formats; the win rate drops noticeably in five-setters, which has direct implications for Grand Slam performance on hard.

Best season: 2020 — 14–12 (53.8%) from 26 matches. The best single-season display to date — a useful reference point as the hard record continues to develop.

Recent Form 2026: 5–10 (33.3%) on hard. Last 10: L L L L W L W L W L — mixed results, some inconsistency in the current period.

Loading matches…

Matches — Hard