Jan Kroslak has found the Tour difficult, recording 76–96 across 172 matches (44.2%). The numbers point to a player still building their Tour presence — a key area of opportunity going forward. Claimed 2 titles: Tel Aviv, Shanghai.
At Grand Slam level (Australian Open, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, US Open): Jan Kroslak is 11–15 (42.3%) across 26 Grand Slam matches — below .500, though the elite draw depth makes that a notoriously difficult barrier.
ATP Masters 1000 (Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo, Madrid, Rome, Canada, Cincinnati, Shanghai, Paris): Jan Kroslak has struggled at Masters level: 2–7 (22.2%) in 9 matches. Improving at this level is the clearest path to a stronger overall record.
3 finals reached — won 2, lost 1 (solid 67% conversion) — consistently getting to finals and winning the majority is a hallmark of elite performers. 6 semifinals. 10 quarterfinals.
vs. Top 10: 2–9 (18.2%, 11 matches). Top 10 opponents have represented a clear ceiling; addressing that deficit is the single biggest lever for improving the overall record.
By format — best-of-five: 15–17 (46.9%); best-of-three: 61–79 (43.6%). Slightly better in five-set matches — a positive sign for Grand Slam campaigns specifically.
Peak season: 1996 — 20–18 (52.6%) from 38 matches. That year captures the ceiling of what Jan Kroslak can do when performing at their best and represents the standard to aim for.
