Botic van de Zandschulp 2026 ATP Season – Match Results & Stats
In the 2026 ATP season, Botic van de Zandschulp played 9 matches, winning 5 and losing 4. He won 5 matches on hard, 0 on clay and 0 on grass. He has win percentages of 55.6% on hard, 0% on clay, and 0% on grass courts. He has overall win percentage of 55.6%.
Botic van de Zandschulp
Season:
Wins: 5–4 (55.6%)
Hong Kong2026
R32W - L :1-0
ATP 250Hard
Australian Open2026
R32W - L :2-1
Grand SlamHard
Montpellier2026
R32W - L :0-1
ATP 250Hard
Rotterdam2026
QFW - L :2-1
ATP 500Hard
Indian Wells Masters2026
R128W - L :0-1
Masters 1000Hard
W-L
Season
55.6%
5-4 (9)
Surfaces
Hard
55.6%
5-4 (9)
Categories
Grand Slam
66.7%
2-1 (3)
Masters 1000
0.0%
0-1 (1)
ATP 250
50.0%
1-1 (2)
ATP 500
66.7%
2-1 (3)
Ranking
Vs Top 1
0%
0-0 (0)
Vs Top 5
0.0%
0-1 (1)
Vs Top 10
0.0%
0-2 (2)
Vs Top 20
0.0%
0-2 (2)
Vs Top 50
40.0%
2-3 (5)
Vs Top 100
42.9%
3-4 (7)
Vs 101+
100.0%
2-0 (2)
Vs higher ranked
40.0%
2-3 (5)
Vs lower ranked
75.0%
3-1 (4)
Unknown rank
0%
0-0 (0)
Rounds
QF
0.0%
0-1 (1)
R16
100.0%
1-0 (1)
R32
50.0%
2-2 (4)
R64
100.0%
1-0 (1)
R128
50.0%
1-1 (2)
W-L Sets
Sets
56.0%
14-11 (25)
W-L Games
Games
51.3%
135-128 (263)
Tiebreaks
Standard TB
66.7%
6-3 (9)
Match TB
0%
0-0 (0)
Overall
66.7%
6-3 (9)
Summary Season
| Year | M | W | L | Win% | Set W-L | Set% | Game W-L | Game% | TB W-L | TB% | MS | Hld% | Brk% | A% | DF% | 1stIn | 1st% | 2nd% | SPW | RPW | TPW | DR | Best | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.56% | 14-11 | 56.00% | 135-128 | 51.33% | 6-3 | 66.67% | 9 | 78.16% | 24.72% | 10.22% | 6.08% | 65.94% | 76.75% | 46.43% | 66.42% | 35.76% | 50.93% | 1.06 | QF (1x) | View All Matches |
Service Statistics
1st Serve %
65.94%
1st Srv Won %
76.75%
2nd Srv Won %
46.43%
Svc Pts Won %
66.42%
BP Saved %
61.22%
Svc Gms Won %
78.16%
Ace %
10.22%
Double Fault %
6.08%
Return Statistics
1st Ret Won %
29.68%
2nd Ret Won %
48.35%
Ret Pts Won %
35.76%
BP Won %
35.48%
Ret Gms Won %
24.72%
Ace Against %
7.99%
Double Fault Against %
2.98%