Site logo

Jim Grabb vs Michael Chang Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Grabb seasons:19971996199519941993
Michael Chang seasons:20032002200120001999
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Grabb
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Michael Chang
Age: 61y 340d (1964-04-14)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1972-02-22) Age: 54y 26d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
2 - 6
Wins: 25.0% - 75.0%
Hard 1–4Clay 0–1Grass 0–0
Others 1–1500 1–1250 0–1Slam 0–2Masters 1000 0–1
LLLLL
WWWWW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb and πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang have met 8 times. Michael Chang currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb has compiled an overall career record of 179–199 across 378 matches, translating to a win rate of 47.35%. On hard courts his record stands at 127–126 (50.20%), while on clay he holds a 3–13 (18.75%) mark. On grass the numbers read 10–20 (33.33%) , and on carpet 39–40 (49.37%). Throughout his career he has won 2 titles (1 hard, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 8–29 (21.62%).

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 662–312 from 974 matches (67.97% win rate). His hard-court record is 415–173 (70.58%), on clay he stands at 107–58 (64.85%), and on grass he has gone 30–25 (54.55%) , with a carpet record of 110–56 (66.27%). He has accumulated 34 titles in total (22 hard, 4 clay, 8 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 51–94 (35.17%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 5 times, with Michael Chang leading 4–1 (80.00%). The clay record between them sits at 1–0 (100.00% for Michael Chang) across 1 matches.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1995-03-13Miami MastersHardR644πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)70πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb6-0 6-33734553.4%83.9%48.1%3/3
1995-02-20PhiladelphiaCarpetR166πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)71πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb7-6(5) 7-53968050.8%93.5%80.0%0/0
1994-08-29US OpenHardR326πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (6)95πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb (WC)6-1 4-1 RET512150.0%85.7%52.4%0/0
1994-05-23Roland GarrosClayR1288πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (8)130πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb6-3 7-6(1) 6-15-2262.2%80.4%61.8%1/2
1992-04-13Hong KongHardR166πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)74πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb6-2 6-43810184.3%79.1%62.5%3/3
1992-02-17PhiladelphiaCarpetR3288πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb12πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)6-3 3-6 6-2312210064.3%86.7%48.0%1/2
1989-08-14CincinnatiHardR326πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)62πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb6-3 5-7 7-63------0/0
1989-07-31Stratton MountainHardQF114πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Grabb6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (2)6-2 6-43------0/0

Wins

Jim Grabb
Michael Chang
2–6Overall
0–2Grand Slam
0–1Masters 1000
1–1ATP 500
0–1ATP 250
1–1Others
1–4Hard
0–1Clay
1–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

33.3%2
66.7%4
Bo3
0.0%0
100.0%2
Bo5
20.0%1
80.0%4
2 Sets
33.3%1
66.7%2
3 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

Deciding

50.0%1
50.0%1
Decider Set
0.0%0
100.0%3
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

Sets

26.3%5
73.7%14
All
0.0%0
100.0%5
Grand Slam
0.0%0
100.0%2
Masters 1000
27.3%3
72.7%8
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
0.0%0
100.0%3
Clay
40.0%2
60.0%3
Carpet
Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

Games

42.4%75
57.6%102
All
29.3%12
70.7%29
Grand Slam
20.0%3
80.0%12
Masters 1000
40.2%39
59.8%58
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
34.5%10
65.5%19
Clay
51.0%26
49.0%25
Carpet
Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

Overview

By Surface

Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

By Tournament Level

Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

By Round

Jim Grabb
Michael Chang

By Opponent Ranking

Jim GrabbMichael Chang
0%0-1
vs Top 1
25%7-21
21.1%4-15
vs Top 5
31.6%30-65
21.6%8-29
vs Top 10
35.2%51-94
23.9%16-51
vs Top 20
40.3%94-139
39.8%97-147
vs Top 100
62.3%475-288
60.6%80-52
vs +100
88.4%183-24
39.5%90-138
vs Higher
37.3%76-128
58.8%87-61
vs Lower
76.1%582-183

Opponent Breakdown

Jim GrabbMichael Chang
45.9%123-145
Vs Younger
62.6%196-117
50.5%55-54
Vs Older
70.5%466-195
47.5%149-165
Vs Right-Handed
66.6%524-263
46.9%30-34
Vs Left-Handed
73.7%137-49
29.5%13-31
Vs 2H Backhand
56%98-77
20%4-16
Vs 1H Backhand
53.1%86-76
47.5%159-176
Vs Shorter
77.1%27-8
47.1%8-9
Vs Taller
67.4%590-286

Pressure Situations