Jim Courier vs Pete Sampras Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis
H2H Preview
Jim Courier and
Pete Sampras have built a notable rivalry on the ATP Tour, having clashed 20 times. Pete Sampras currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 16β4.
Looking at their individual career profiles, Jim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506β237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295β123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115β53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28β17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68β44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53β73 (42.06%).
Pete Sampras, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 762β222 from 984 matches (77.44% win rate). His hard-court record is 429β103 (80.64%), on clay he stands at 90β54 (62.50%), and on grass he has gone 101β20 (83.47%) , with a carpet record of 142β45 (75.94%). He has accumulated 64 titles in total (36 hard, 3 clay, 10 grass, 15 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 124β71 (63.59%).
When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 12 times, with Pete Sampras leading 11β1 (91.67%). The clay record between them sits at 2β1 (66.67% for Jim Courier) across 3 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1β0 (100.00% for Pete Sampras).
At the Grand Slam level β where the best-of-five format adds an extra layer of physical and mental endurance β the two have crossed paths 8 times, producing a Slam record of 6β2 in favour of Pete Sampras. These matches, often played in front of the largest tennis audiences, frequently prove decisive in shaping the broader narrative of a rivalry.
DateβΌ | Tourney | Surface | Round | Wrk | Winner | Lrk | Loser | Score | BoF | Min | WA | WDF | W1stIn | W1st% | W2nd% | BPSvd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999-03-15 | Miami Masters | Hard | R64 | 2 | 52 | 6-3 7-6(3) | 3 | 82 | 10 | 7 | 56.3% | 82.5% | 61.3% | 2/2 | ||
| 1997-05-12 | Rome Masters | Clay | R64 | 24 | 1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | 3 | 94 | 5 | 2 | 62.3% | 78.9% | 60.9% | 0/2 | ||
| 1996-05-27 | Roland Garros | Clay | QF | 1 | 8 | 6-7(4) 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | 5 | 219 | 28 | 2 | 66.1% | 79.7% | 63.5% | 7/9 | ||
| 1995-10-30 | Paris Masters | Carpet | SF | 2 | 7 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 3 | 123 | 17 | 2 | 58.5% | 81.3% | 44.1% | 2/4 | ||
| 1995-10-23 | Essen Masters | Carpet | QF | 2 | 8 | 6-2 7-6(6) | 3 | 95 | 13 | 1 | 49.3% | 85.7% | 47.2% | 4/5 | ||
| 1995-08-28 | US Open | Hard | SF | 2 | 15 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 7-5 | 5 | - | 26 | 7 | 60.0% | 86.5% | 53.1% | 8/9 | ||
| 1995-01-16 | Australian Open | Hard | QF | 1 | 11 | 6-7(4) 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 6-3 | 5 | 238 | 24 | 4 | 56.5% | 88.5% | 57.5% | 3/4 | ||
| 1994-05-23 | Roland Garros | Clay | QF | 7 | 1 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 6-4 | 5 | - | 6 | 3 | 67.7% | 73.3% | 53.5% | 7/10 | ||
| 1994-03-07 | Miami Masters | Hard | SF | 1 | 5 | 6-4 7-6(10) | 3 | 117 | 11 | 4 | 51.9% | 78.6% | 51.3% | 3/5 | ||
| 1994-01-17 | Australian Open | Hard | SF | 1 | 3 | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | 5 | - | 11 | 4 | 58.0% | 78.9% | 45.5% | 6/9 | ||
| 1993-06-21 | Wimbledon | Grass | F | 1 | 2 | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | 5 | - | 22 | 7 | 65.1% | 86.6% | 57.7% | 0/2 | ||
| 1993-04-12 | Hong Kong | Hard | F | 1 | 2 | 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(2) | 3 | 171 | 17 | 2 | 47.7% | 80.4% | 60.7% | 2/2 | ||
| 1992-11-16 | ATP Tour World Championships | Carpet | SF | 1 | 3 | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | 3 | 106 | 17 | 3 | 65.7% | 83.1% | 58.8% | 3/4 | ||
| 1992-08-31 | US Open | Hard | SF | 3 | 1 | 6-1 3-6 6-2 6-2 | 5 | 161 | 12 | 4 | 58.1% | 68.4% | 57.9% | 9/11 | ||
| 1992-08-17 | Indianapolis | Hard | F | 3 | 1 | 6-4 6-4 | 3 | 98 | 8 | 2 | 61.3% | 84.2% | 58.3% | 2/2 | ||
| 1991-11-12 | ATP Tour World Championships | Carpet | F | 7 | 2 | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4 | 5 | 129 | 10 | 5 | 61.5% | 72.2% | 64.4% | 1/5 | ||
| 1991-08-26 | US Open | Hard | QF | 5 | 6 | 6-2 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | 5 | 175 | 14 | 2 | 61.9% | 83.3% | 70.3% | 1/1 | ||
| 1991-08-12 | Indianapolis | Hard | SF | 8 | 5 | 6-3 7-6(7) | 3 | 96 | 6 | 2 | 50.9% | 92.9% | 59.3% | 0/1 | ||
| 1991-08-05 | Cincinnati Masters | Hard | SF | 8 | 5 | 6-2 7-5 | 3 | 94 | 3 | 0 | 37.3% | 90.9% | 62.2% | 1/1 | ||
| 1988-10-03 | Scottsdale | Hard | R32 | 157 | 79 | 6-3 6-1 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0/0 |
Wins
Sets Format
Deciding
Sets
Games
H2H Series Progression
HardClayGrassCarpet