Site logo

Jim Courier vs Pete Sampras Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Courier seasons:20001999199819971996
Pete Sampras seasons:20022001200019991998
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Courier
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Pete Sampras
Age: 55y 214d (1970-08-17)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1971-08-12) Age: 54y 219d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
4 - 16
Wins: 20.0% - 80.0%
Hard 1–11Clay 2–1Grass 0–1
Others 0–1Masters 1000 1–5500 0–2Slam 2–6Finals 1–1250 0–1
LLLWL
WWWLW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier and πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras have built a notable rivalry on the ATP Tour, having clashed 20 times. Pete Sampras currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 16–4.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506–237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295–123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115–53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28–17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68–44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53–73 (42.06%).

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 762–222 from 984 matches (77.44% win rate). His hard-court record is 429–103 (80.64%), on clay he stands at 90–54 (62.50%), and on grass he has gone 101–20 (83.47%) , with a carpet record of 142–45 (75.94%). He has accumulated 64 titles in total (36 hard, 3 clay, 10 grass, 15 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 124–71 (63.59%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 12 times, with Pete Sampras leading 11–1 (91.67%). The clay record between them sits at 2–1 (66.67% for Jim Courier) across 3 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Pete Sampras).

At the Grand Slam level β€” where the best-of-five format adds an extra layer of physical and mental endurance β€” the two have crossed paths 8 times, producing a Slam record of 6–2 in favour of Pete Sampras. These matches, often played in front of the largest tennis audiences, frequently prove decisive in shaping the broader narrative of a rivalry.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1999-03-15Miami MastersHardR642πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (2)52πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-3 7-6(3)38210756.3%82.5%61.3%2/2
1997-05-12Rome MastersClayR6424πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)7-6(5) 6-43945262.3%78.9%60.9%0/2
1996-05-27Roland GarrosClayQF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)8πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (7)6-7(4) 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4521928266.1%79.7%63.5%7/9
1995-10-30Paris MastersCarpetSF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (6)6-4 3-6 6-3312317258.5%81.3%44.1%2/4
1995-10-23Essen MastersCarpetQF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (2)8πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (7)6-2 7-6(6)39513149.3%85.7%47.2%4/5
1995-08-28US OpenHardSF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (2)15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (14)7-5 4-6 6-4 7-55-26760.0%86.5%53.1%8/9
1995-01-16Australian OpenHardQF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)11πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (9)6-7(4) 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 6-3523824456.5%88.5%57.5%3/4
1994-05-23Roland GarrosClayQF7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (7)1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)6-4 5-7 6-4 6-45-6367.7%73.3%53.5%7/10
1994-03-07Miami MastersHardSF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)6-4 7-6(10)311711451.9%78.6%51.3%3/5
1994-01-17Australian OpenHardSF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)3πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)6-3 6-4 6-45-11458.0%78.9%45.5%6/9
1993-06-21WimbledonGrassF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (1)2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)7-6(3) 7-6(6) 3-6 6-35-22765.1%86.6%57.7%0/2
1993-04-12Hong KongHardF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (2)2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(2)317117247.7%80.4%60.7%2/2
1992-11-16ATP Tour World ChampionshipsCarpetSF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier3πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras7-6(5) 7-6(4)310617365.7%83.1%58.8%3/4
1992-08-31US OpenHardSF3πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (3)1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6-1 3-6 6-2 6-2516112458.1%68.4%57.9%9/11
1992-08-17IndianapolisHardF3πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (2)1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6-4 6-43988261.3%84.2%58.3%2/2
1991-11-12ATP Tour World ChampionshipsCarpetF7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4512910561.5%72.2%64.4%1/5
1991-08-26US OpenHardQF5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (6)6-2 7-6(4) 7-6(5)517514261.9%83.3%70.3%1/1
1991-08-12IndianapolisHardSF8πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (5)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)6-3 7-6(7)3966250.9%92.9%59.3%0/1
1991-08-05Cincinnati MastersHardSF8πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras (7)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)6-2 7-53943037.3%90.9%62.2%1/1
1988-10-03ScottsdaleHardR32157πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈPete Sampras79πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-3 6-13------0/0

Wins

Jim Courier
Pete Sampras
4–16Overall
2–6Grand Slam
1–5Masters 1000
0–2ATP 500
0–1ATP 250
0–1Others
1–1Tour Finals
1–11Hard
2–1Clay
0–1Grass
1–3Indoor Hard

Sets Format

18.2%2
81.8%9
Bo3
22.2%2
77.8%7
Bo5
22.2%2
77.8%7
2 Sets
25.0%1
75.0%3
3 Sets
20.0%1
80.0%4
4 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%2
5 Sets
Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

Deciding

0.0%0
100.0%4
Decider Set
25.0%3
75.0%9
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
100.0%2
After 3 hours
Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

Sets

33.3%20
66.7%40
All
40.6%13
59.4%19
Grand Slam
23.1%3
76.9%10
Masters 1000
23.5%8
76.5%26
Hard
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grass
63.6%7
36.4%4
Clay
36.4%4
63.6%7
Carpet
Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

Games

45.3%285
54.7%344
All
46.7%155
53.3%177
Grand Slam
43.8%60
56.2%77
Masters 1000
42.5%149
57.5%202
Hard
47.7%21
52.3%23
Grass
51.7%61
48.3%57
Clay
46.6%54
53.4%62
Carpet
Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

H2H Series Progression

HardClayGrassCarpet

Overview

By Surface

Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

By Tournament Level

Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

By Round

Jim Courier
Pete Sampras

By Opponent Ranking

Jim CourierPete Sampras
35.7%5-9
vs Top 1
46.2%6-7
37.1%26-44
vs Top 5
62.9%61-36
42.1%53-73
vs Top 10
63.6%124-71
49.2%95-98
vs Top 20
65.5%220-116
64.5%379-209
vs Top 100
74.8%618-208
81.6%124-28
vs +100
91.5%140-13
43.5%77-100
vs Higher
49.5%50-51
75.7%426-137
vs Lower
80.7%708-169

Opponent Breakdown

Jim CourierPete Sampras
62.7%197-117
Vs Younger
76.4%305-94
72%308-120
Vs Older
78.1%457-128
66.3%402-204
Vs Right-Handed
76%619-195
75.9%104-33
Vs Left-Handed
84.1%143-27
66.2%102-52
Vs 2H Backhand
73.1%198-73
47.5%56-62
Vs 1H Backhand
71.8%122-48
71.4%222-89
Vs Shorter
80.1%314-78
65.5%192-101
Vs Taller
76.1%318-100

Pressure Situations