Site logo

Cedric Pioline vs Thomas Muster Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cedric Pioline seasons:20022001200019991998
Thomas Muster seasons:20112010199919981997
🇫🇷 Cedric Pioline
🇦🇹 Thomas Muster
Age: 56y 333d (1969-06-15)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1967-10-02) Age: 58y 224d
Hand: L
Backhand: 1H
2 - 6
Wins: 25.0% - 75.0%
Hard 1–1Clay 1–5Grass 0–0
250 1–2Slam 0–2Masters 1000 0–2500 1–0
LLWLW
WWLWL

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Cedric Pioline and 🇦🇹Thomas Muster have met 8 times. Thomas Muster currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Cedric Pioline has compiled an overall career record of 389–317 across 706 matches, translating to a win rate of 55.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 151–121 (55.51%), while on clay he holds a 118–102 (53.64%) mark. On grass the numbers read 45–30 (60.00%) , and on carpet 75–64 (53.96%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 25–67 (27.17%).

🇦🇹Thomas Muster, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 625–273 from 898 matches (69.60% win rate). His hard-court record is 149–84 (63.95%), on clay he stands at 426–127 (77.03%), and on grass he has gone 8–10 (44.44%) , with a carpet record of 42–52 (44.68%). He has accumulated 44 titles in total (3 hard, 40 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 37–51 (42.05%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 2 times, the record is tied 1–1 (50.00% each). The clay record between them sits at 5–1 (83.33% for Thomas Muster) across 6 matches.

Dateâ–¼
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1998-08-24BostonHardQF17🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (3)24🇦🇹Thomas Muster (5)7-5 6-331034356.9%73.0%46.4%5/8
1998-03-09Indian Wells MastersHardR3220🇦🇹Thomas Muster16🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (15)4-6 6-3 6-431124157.7%70.0%47.7%9/12
1997-04-14BarcelonaClayR1634🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (16)2🇦🇹Thomas Muster (1)7-6(4) 6-43882368.7%76.1%66.7%0/1
1996-04-22Monte Carlo MastersClaySF2🇦🇹Thomas Muster (1)29🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-3 6-33772270.7%73.2%52.9%3/5
1995-09-11BucharestClayR163🇦🇹Thomas Muster (1)58🇫🇷Cedric Pioline7-5 6-33853167.3%81.1%50.0%2/3
1995-05-29Roland GarrosClayR645🇦🇹Thomas Muster (5)58🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-1 6-3 6-35-0058.0%77.5%69.0%0/0
1993-05-24Roland GarrosClayR6416🇦🇹Thomas Muster (15)21🇫🇷Cedric Pioline7-6 2-6 6-4 6-251911559.7%67.4%44.8%13/17
1991-06-17GenovaClayQF116🇦🇹Thomas Muster87🇫🇷Cedric Pioline4-6 7-6(3) 6-231690478.5%62.7%39.3%11/16

Wins

Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster
2–6Overall
0–2Grand Slam
0–2Masters 1000
1–0ATP 500
1–2ATP 250
1–1Hard
1–5Clay

Sets Format

33.3%2
66.7%4
Bo3
0.0%0
100.0%2
Bo5
50.0%2
50.0%2
2 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%3
3 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%1
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

Deciding

0.0%0
100.0%2
Decider Set
33.3%1
66.7%2
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
100.0%1
After 3 hours
Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

Sets

33.3%7
66.7%14
All
14.3%1
85.7%6
Grand Slam
20.0%1
80.0%4
Masters 1000
60.0%3
40.0%2
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
25.0%4
75.0%12
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

Games

44.4%92
55.6%115
All
39.1%25
60.9%39
Grand Slam
40.4%19
59.6%28
Masters 1000
52.0%26
48.0%24
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
42.0%66
58.0%91
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

Overview

By Surface

Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

By Tournament Level

Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

By Round

Cedric Pioline
Thomas Muster

By Opponent Ranking

Cedric PiolineThomas Muster
12.5%1-7
vs Top 1
11.1%1-8
26.1%12-34
vs Top 5
36.2%17-30
27.2%25-67
vs Top 10
42%37-51
30.4%52-119
vs Top 20
45.7%79-94
51.8%298-277
vs Top 100
64.2%405-226
69.8%90-39
vs +100
82.4%215-46
39.4%100-154
vs Higher
47.2%91-102
64%288-162
vs Lower
75.6%528-170

Opponent Breakdown

Cedric PiolineThomas Muster
55.6%267-213
Vs Younger
71%385-157
54%122-104
Vs Older
67.2%238-116
55.3%320-259
Vs Right-Handed
68.7%528-241
54.3%69-58
Vs Left-Handed
75%96-32
44.8%73-90
Vs 2H Backhand
60%72-48
46.2%54-63
Vs 1H Backhand
56.4%57-44
56.1%224-175
Vs Shorter
76.1%143-45
52.2%109-100
Vs Taller
66.6%383-192

Pressure Situations