Site logo

Cedric Pioline vs Richard Krajicek Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cedric Pioline seasons:20022001200019991998
Richard Krajicek seasons:20032002200019991998
🇫🇷 Cedric Pioline
🇳🇱 Richard Krajicek
Age: 56y 322d (1969-06-15)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1971-12-06) Age: 54y 148d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
5 - 2
Wins: 71.4% - 28.6%
Hard 0–1Clay 2–0Grass 0–0
Masters 1000 0–2250 1–0Slam 1–0500 2–0Davis Cup 1–0
LWWWW
WLLLL

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Cedric Pioline and 🇳🇱Richard Krajicek have met 7 times. Cedric Pioline currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 5–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Cedric Pioline has compiled an overall career record of 389–317 across 706 matches, translating to a win rate of 55.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 151–121 (55.51%), while on clay he holds a 118–102 (53.64%) mark. On grass the numbers read 45–30 (60.00%) , and on carpet 75–64 (53.96%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 25–67 (27.17%).

🇳🇱Richard Krajicek, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 411–219 from 630 matches (65.24% win rate). His hard-court record is 188–94 (66.67%), on clay he stands at 79–53 (59.85%), and on grass he has gone 63–25 (71.59%) , with a carpet record of 81–47 (63.28%). He has accumulated 17 titles in total (7 hard, 1 clay, 3 grass, 6 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 44–54 (44.90%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 1 times, with Richard Krajicek leading 1–0 (100.00%). The clay record between them sits at 2–0 (100.00% for Cedric Pioline) across 2 matches.

Dateâ–¼
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1999-04-02Davis Cup WG R1: FRA vs NEDClayRR21🇫🇷Cedric Pioline4🇳🇱Richard Krajicek6-3 3-6 7-5 7-6(5)5------0/0
1999-02-15RotterdamCarpetR1618🇫🇷Cedric Pioline10🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (4)7-6(5) 7-6(9)31071560.4%87.3%47.2%4/5
1998-10-12ViennaCarpetR1616🇫🇷Cedric Pioline11🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (6)7-6(1) 6-7(5) 6-431516859.0%87.0%43.8%2/3
1998-05-25Roland GarrosClayR3217🇫🇷Cedric Pioline10🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (10)6-3 6-2 7-551243449.5%76.6%56.3%4/6
1997-08-04Cincinnati MastersHardR6415🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (12)23🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-3 6-437913159.0%75.0%44.0%3/5
1996-03-04RotterdamCarpetR1635🇫🇷Cedric Pioline26🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (6)7-6(5) 6-338310453.0%77.1%67.7%1/2
1995-10-30Paris MastersCarpetR3214🇳🇱Richard Krajicek (12)50🇫🇷Cedric Pioline4-6 6-4 7-5313617558.3%74.6%47.9%8/9

Wins

Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek
5–2Overall
1–0Grand Slam
0–2Masters 1000
2–0ATP 500
1–0ATP 250
1–0Davis Cup
0–1Hard
2–0Clay
3–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

60.0%3
40.0%2
Bo3
100.0%2
0.0%0
Bo5
66.7%2
33.3%1
2 Sets
66.7%2
33.3%1
3 Sets
100.0%1
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

Deciding

50.0%1
50.0%1
Decider Set
100.0%4
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

Sets

68.4%13
31.6%6
All
100.0%3
0.0%0
Grand Slam
20.0%1
80.0%4
Masters 1000
0.0%0
100.0%2
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
85.7%6
14.3%1
Clay
70.0%7
30.0%3
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

Games

53.1%110
46.9%97
All
65.5%19
34.5%10
Grand Slam
43.1%22
56.9%29
Masters 1000
36.8%7
63.2%12
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
58.3%42
41.7%30
Clay
52.6%61
47.4%55
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

Overview

By Surface

Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

By Tournament Level

Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

By Round

Cedric Pioline
Richard Krajicek

By Opponent Ranking

Cedric PiolineRichard Krajicek
12.5%1-7
vs Top 1
58.3%7-5
26.1%12-34
vs Top 5
41.1%23-33
27.2%25-67
vs Top 10
44.9%44-54
30.4%52-119
vs Top 20
46.7%77-88
51.8%298-277
vs Top 100
62.5%316-190
69.8%90-39
vs +100
76.4%94-29
39.4%100-154
vs Higher
52.9%90-80
64%288-162
vs Lower
69.9%320-138

Opponent Breakdown

Cedric PiolineRichard Krajicek
55.6%267-213
Vs Younger
65.7%174-91
54%122-104
Vs Older
64.9%237-128
55.3%320-259
Vs Right-Handed
64.9%338-183
54.3%69-58
Vs Left-Handed
66.7%72-36
44.8%73-90
Vs 2H Backhand
56.8%84-64
46.2%54-63
Vs 1H Backhand
59.5%66-45
56.1%224-175
Vs Shorter
64.6%385-211
52.2%109-100
Vs Taller
58.3%7-5

Pressure Situations