Petr Luxa

Hard Clay Grass

Showing last 10 matchesView All Matches ↗

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
2003-09-22	Bangkok	Hard	R32	6	Carlos Moya	402	Petr Luxa	6-4 6-3
2002-09-30	Tokyo	Hard	R64	85	Antony Dupuis	361	Petr Luxa	6-3 6-4
2001-09-17	Shanghai	Hard	R32	124	George Bastl	353	Petr Luxa	6-1 7-5
2000-02-28	Copenhagen	Hard	R32	72	Ivan Ljubicic	168	Petr Luxa	6-7(6) 6-1 6-3
2000-01-03	Doha	Hard	R32	72	Gaston Gaudio	181	Petr Luxa	4-6 6-0 6-2
1999-09-27	Toulouse	Hard	R16	24	Thomas Johansson	232	Petr Luxa	6-2 6-4
1999-09-27	Toulouse	Hard	R32	232	Petr Luxa	101	Ivan Ljubicic	6-2 6-4
1999-04-05	Hong Kong	Hard	R32	307	Paradorn Srichaphan	206	Petr Luxa	6-1 7-6(11)
1999-01-18	Australian Open	Hard	R128	50	Jerome Golmard	220	Petr Luxa	6-2 7-6(4) 6-4
1998-09-14	Tashkent	Hard	R32	212	Eyal Ran	161	Petr Luxa	6-3 6-3

W-L: 1-9 (10.00%)

Matches on Hard

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
2003-09-22	Bangkok	Hard	R32	6	Carlos Moya (3)	402	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-4 6-3	H2H	3	83	2	4	52.9%	80.6%	34.4%	6/9
2002-09-30	Tokyo	Hard	R64	85	Antony Dupuis	361	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-3 6-4	H2H	3	72	8	1	69.1%	70.2%	71.4%	3/3
2001-09-17	Shanghai	Hard	R32	124	George Bastl	353	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-1 7-5	H2H	3	82	3	1	83.9%	71.2%	20.0%	5/8
2000-02-28	Copenhagen	Hard	R32	72	Ivan Ljubicic	168	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-7(6) 6-1 6-3	H2H	3	132	8	4	48.5%	88.0%	43.4%	7/9
2000-01-03	Doha	Hard	R32	72	Gaston Gaudio	181	Petr Luxa (Q)	4-6 6-0 6-2	H2H	3	110	0	2	68.1%	71.0%	34.5%	4/6
1999-09-27	Toulouse	Hard	R16	24	Thomas Johansson (3)	232	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	70	10	3	53.1%	82.4%	46.7%	3/4
1999-09-27	Toulouse	Hard	R32	232	Petr Luxa (Q)	101	Ivan Ljubicic	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	81	5	1	59.3%	81.3%	59.1%	3/3
1999-04-05	Hong Kong	Hard	R32	307	Paradorn Srichaphan (Q)	206	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-1 7-6(11)	H2H	3	85	6	2	68.7%	82.6%	52.4%	0/0
1999-01-18	Australian Open	Hard	R128	50	Jerome Golmard	220	Petr Luxa (Q)	6-2 7-6(4) 6-4	H2H	5	126	3	5	56.4%	66.7%	52.3%	4/8
1998-09-14	Tashkent	Hard	R32	212	Eyal Ran	161	Petr Luxa	6-3 6-3	H2H	3	63	0	2	58.2%	53.1%	73.9%	3/5