Matches — 2005
W-L: 2-3 (40.00%)
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Wrk | Winner | Lrk | Loser | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-09-12 | Beijing | Hard | R32 | 24 | 270 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| 2005-08-01 | Washington | Hard | R64 | 243 | 155 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| 2005-08-01 | Washington | Hard | R32 | 37 | 243 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | Hard | R128 | 343 | 110 | 4-6 4-6 6-1 5-0 RET | ||
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | Hard | R64 | 34 | 343 | 6-3 6-2 7-6(3) |
Nathan Healey
W-L: 2-3 (40.00%)
Matches in 2005
| Date ▼ | Tourney | Surface | Round | Wrk | Winner | Lrk | Loser | Score | H2H | BoF | Min | WA | WDF | W1stIn | W1st% | W2nd% | BPSvd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-09-12 | Beijing | Hard | R32 | 24 |  Mikhail Youzhny (7) | 270 | Nathan Healey (Q) | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | 3 | 91 | 2 | 1 | 63.1% | 65.9% | 62.5% | 0/2 |
| 2005-08-01 | Washington | Hard | R32 | 37 |  Greg Rusedski (11) | 243 | Nathan Healey (Q) | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | 3 | 81 | 9 | 4 | 52.3% | 88.2% | 61.3% | 2/2 |
| 2005-08-01 | Washington | Hard | R64 | 243 | Nathan Healey (Q) | 155 |  Gregory Carraz | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | 3 | 46 | 18 | 3 | 60.0% | 100.0% | 57.1% | 0/0 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | Hard | R64 | 34 |  Jurgen Melzer (32) | 343 | Nathan Healey (WC) | 6-3 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | 5 | 105 | 3 | 3 | 72.4% | 82.5% | 50.0% | 0/1 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | Hard | R128 | 343 | Nathan Healey (WC) | 110 |  Flavio Saretta | 4-6 4-6 6-1 5-0 RET | H2H | 5 | 130 | 13 | 8 | 57.1% | 71.9% | 43.8% | 10/14 |