W-L: 8-2 (80.00%)

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
1992-11-09	Moscow	Carpet	R32	111	Markus Zoecke	52	Jim Grabb	7-5 6-4
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R16	48	Jakob Hlasek	59	Jim Grabb	4-6 6-1 6-2
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R64	59	Jim Grabb	47	Gabriel Markus	6-3 6-2
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R32	59	Jim Grabb	11	MaliVai Washington	4-6 6-4 6-0
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	F	77	Jim Grabb	123	Jamie Morgan	6-3 6-3
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	R32	77	Jim Grabb	-	Sven Salumaa	7-5 6-7(3) 6-4
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	R16	77	Jim Grabb	321	Bing Chao Lin	6-3 6-3
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	QF	77	Jim Grabb	119	Brett Steven	5-7 6-3 6-2
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	SF	77	Jim Grabb	98	Patrik Kuhnen	6-3 6-1
1992-10-12	Tokyo Indoor	Carpet	R64	78	Jim Grabb	75	Kenneth Carlsen	5-7 7-6(1) 6-2

Jim Grabb

W-L: 8-2 (80.00%)

Matches in 1992

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
1992-11-09	Moscow	Carpet	R32	111	Markus Zoecke	52	Jim Grabb	7-5 6-4	H2H	3	76	3	1	71.4%	82.5%	87.5%	2/2
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R16	48	Jakob Hlasek	59	Jim Grabb (Q)	4-6 6-1 6-2	H2H	3	101	6	1	72.1%	77.3%	64.7%	4/6
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R32	59	Jim Grabb (Q)	11	MaliVai Washington (10)	4-6 6-4 6-0	H2H	3	123	11	5	69.5%	68.2%	44.8%	11/13
1992-11-02	Paris Masters	Carpet	R64	59	Jim Grabb (Q)	47	Gabriel Markus	6-3 6-2	H2H	3	74	6	3	68.1%	81.3%	73.3%	0/0
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	F	77	Jim Grabb (3)	123	Jamie Morgan	6-3 6-3	H2H	3	83	1	3	54.9%	82.1%	60.9%	4/5
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	SF	77	Jim Grabb (3)	98	Patrik Kuhnen (8)	6-3 6-1	H2H	3	59	3	3	71.7%	84.8%	30.8%	1/2
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	QF	77	Jim Grabb (3)	119	Brett Steven	5-7 6-3 6-2	H2H	3	155	5	9	64.4%	80.6%	35.1%	7/9
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	R16	77	Jim Grabb (3)	321	Bing Chao Lin (LL)	6-3 6-3	H2H	3	56	8	1	56.1%	100.0%	72.2%	0/0
1992-10-19	Taipei	Carpet	R32	77	Jim Grabb (3)	-	Sven Salumaa (Q)	7-5 6-7(3) 6-4	H2H	3	134	7	2	71.3%	77.6%	63.0%	4/6
1992-10-12	Tokyo Indoor	Carpet	R64	78	Jim Grabb	75	Kenneth Carlsen (Q)	5-7 7-6(1) 6-2	H2H	3	149	16	2	69.6%	80.3%	41.9%	6/8