David Rikl

Hard Clay Grass

Showing last 10 matchesView All Matches ↗

Date	Tournament	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score
1999-09-24	Davis Cup WG PO: UZB vs CZE	Hard	RR	863	David Rikl	166	Vadim Kutsenko	4-6 6-2 6-3
1997-09-29	Beijing	Hard	R16	47	Magnus Gustafsson	188	David Rikl	6-2 6-4
1997-09-29	Beijing	Hard	R32	188	David Rikl	157	David Wheaton	7-5 6-3(4)
1997-02-10	Dubai	Hard	R32	52	Sandon Stolle	182	David Rikl	7-5 6-3
1996-08-26	US Open	Hard	R128	134	David Rikl	83	MARHicham Arazi	6-4 7-5 6-2
1996-08-26	US Open	Hard	R64	48	Sjeng Schalken	134	David Rikl	6-2 6-4 6-4
1996-02-19	Memphis	Hard	R64	59	Richey Reneberg	101	David Rikl	6-1 6-2
1996-01-15	Australian Open	Hard	R128	5	Michael Chang	81	David Rikl	6-2 6-1 6-2
1996-01-08	Auckland	Hard	R32	85	David Rikl	37	Jakob Hlasek	7-6(2) 6-2
1996-01-08	Auckland	Hard	QF	43	Brett Steven	85	David Rikl	6-4 7-5

W-L: 4-6 (40.00%)

Matches on Hard

Date ▼	Tourney	Surface	Round	Wrk	Winner	Lrk	Loser	Score	H2H	BoF	Min	WA	WDF	W1stIn	W1st%	W2nd%	BPSvd
1999-09-24	Davis Cup WG PO: UZB vs CZE	Hard	RR	863	David Rikl	166	Vadim Kutsenko	4-6 6-2 6-3	H2H	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
1997-09-29	Beijing	Hard	R16	47	Magnus Gustafsson (5)	188	David Rikl (Q)	6-2 6-4	H2H	3	71	1	5	57.1%	78.6%	42.9%	1/3
1997-09-29	Beijing	Hard	R32	188	David Rikl (Q)	157	David Wheaton (WC)	7-5 6-3(4)	H2H	3	82	7	4	59.7%	72.5%	40.7%	1/4
1997-02-10	Dubai	Hard	R32	52	Sandon Stolle	182	David Rikl (LL)	7-5 6-3	H2H	3	91	3	2	54.8%	52.5%	69.7%	2/4
1996-08-26	US Open	Hard	R64	48	Sjeng Schalken	134	David Rikl	6-2 6-4 6-4	H2H	5	109	8	1	60.6%	73.3%	61.5%	4/5
1996-08-26	US Open	Hard	R128	134	David Rikl	83	MARHicham Arazi	6-4 7-5 6-2	H2H	5	110	4	0	66.2%	84.3%	57.7%	2/4
1996-02-19	Memphis	Hard	R64	59	Richey Reneberg	101	David Rikl	6-1 6-2	H2H	3	64	1	2	40.4%	84.2%	64.3%	1/1
1996-01-15	Australian Open	Hard	R128	5	Michael Chang (5)	81	David Rikl	6-2 6-1 6-2	H2H	5	-	2	1	45.2%	69.7%	60.0%	1/3
1996-01-08	Auckland	Hard	QF	43	Brett Steven (5)	85	David Rikl	6-4 7-5	H2H	3	88	2	0	71.8%	70.6%	55.0%	3/4
1996-01-08	Auckland	Hard	R32	85	David Rikl	37	Jakob Hlasek (4)	7-6(2) 6-2	H2H	3	75	3	1	68.9%	71.4%	52.6%	4/6