Site logo

Sjeng Schalken vs Thomas Enqvist Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Sjeng Schalken seasons:20052004200320022001
Thomas Enqvist seasons:20052004200320022001
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± Sjeng Schalken
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Thomas Enqvist
Age: 49y 192d (1976-09-08)
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
(1974-03-13) Age: 52y 6d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
3 - 3
Wins: 50.0% - 50.0%
Hard 0–1Clay 2–0Grass 1–0
Masters 1000 2–1250 0–2Slam 1–0
LLWLW
WWLWL

H2H Preview

πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken and πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist have met 6 times. The series is tied 3–3.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken has compiled an overall career record of 293–266 across 559 matches, translating to a win rate of 52.42%. On hard courts his record stands at 155–136 (53.26%), while on clay he holds a 66–75 (46.81%) mark. On grass the numbers read 46–30 (60.53%) , and on carpet 26–25 (50.98%). Throughout his career he has won 9 titles (6 hard, 1 clay, 2 grass). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 15–53 (22.06%).

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 448–297 from 745 matches (60.13% win rate). His hard-court record is 294–162 (64.47%), on clay he stands at 58–63 (47.93%), and on grass he has gone 20–21 (48.78%) , with a carpet record of 76–51 (59.84%). He has accumulated 19 titles in total (13 hard, 2 clay, 4 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 41–63 (39.42%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 1 times, with Thomas Enqvist leading 1–0 (100.00%). The clay record between them sits at 2–0 (100.00% for Sjeng Schalken) across 2 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Sjeng Schalken).

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2004-06-21WimbledonGrassR3223πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken (12)57πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist5-7 6-2 3-6 7-6(8) 6-2517618471.5%75.5%59.0%4/8
2003-01-27MilanCarpetR3247πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist17πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken (2)6-4 6-33788460.7%85.3%50.0%1/2
2001-04-16Monte Carlo MastersClayR3230πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken14πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (11)2-6 6-4 6-231032264.1%54.0%67.9%4/7
2000-07-31Canada MastersHardR647πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (6)52πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken7-5 6-431027559.3%74.3%54.2%1/3
1997-10-13LyonCarpetR3217πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (5)57πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken4-6 6-3 6-3311912548.1%76.3%53.7%3/6
1996-04-22Monte Carlo MastersClayR3265πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Sjeng Schalken7πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (7)3-6 6-3 6-331114357.3%69.1%43.9%12/15

Wins

Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist
3–3Overall
1–0Grand Slam
2–1Masters 1000
0–2ATP 250
0–1Hard
2–0Clay
1–0Grass
0–2Indoor Hard

Sets Format

40.0%2
60.0%3
Bo3
100.0%1
0.0%0
Bo5
0.0%0
100.0%2
2 Sets
66.7%2
33.3%1
3 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
4 Sets
100.0%1
0.0%0
5 Sets
Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

Deciding

75.0%3
25.0%1
Decider Set
100.0%1
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

Sets

44.4%8
55.6%10
All
60.0%3
40.0%2
Grand Slam
50.0%4
50.0%4
Masters 1000
0.0%0
100.0%2
Hard
60.0%3
40.0%2
Grass
66.7%4
33.3%2
Clay
20.0%1
80.0%4
Carpet
Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

Games

48.8%84
51.2%88
All
54.0%27
46.0%23
Grand Slam
50.7%38
49.3%37
Masters 1000
40.9%9
59.1%13
Hard
54.0%27
46.0%23
Grass
54.7%29
45.3%24
Clay
40.4%19
59.6%28
Carpet
Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

Overview

By Surface

Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

By Tournament Level

Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

By Round

Sjeng Schalken
Thomas Enqvist

By Opponent Ranking

Sjeng SchalkenThomas Enqvist
9.1%1-10
vs Top 1
22.2%2-7
17.1%6-29
vs Top 5
33.3%18-36
22.1%15-53
vs Top 10
39.4%41-63
27.6%32-84
vs Top 20
43.8%77-99
47.7%206-226
vs Top 100
57.5%349-258
68.3%86-40
vs +100
71.7%99-39
36.8%85-146
vs Higher
44%110-140
63.3%207-120
vs Lower
68.4%338-156

Opponent Breakdown

Sjeng SchalkenThomas Enqvist
47%86-97
Vs Younger
58.1%172-124
55.1%207-169
Vs Older
61.5%276-173
51.9%254-235
Vs Right-Handed
59.4%376-257
55.7%39-31
Vs Left-Handed
64.3%72-40
50.5%94-92
Vs 2H Backhand
55%133-109
40.3%58-86
Vs 1H Backhand
48.6%70-74
53.1%267-236
Vs Shorter
61.3%338-213
50%15-15
Vs Taller
50.9%56-54

Pressure Situations