Site logo

Sebastien Grosjean vs Tim Henman Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Sebastien Grosjean seasons:20102009200820072006
Tim Henman seasons:20072006200520042003
🇫🇷 Sebastien Grosjean
🇬🇧 Tim Henman
Age: 48y 20d (1978-05-29)
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
(1974-09-06) Age: 51y 285d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
3 - 4
Wins: 42.9% - 57.1%
Hard 1–1Clay 0–1Grass 2–1
Slam 1–2Masters 1000 1–2250 1–0
WLWWL
LWLLW

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean and 🇬🇧Tim Henman have met 7 times. Tim Henman currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 4–3.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean has compiled an overall career record of 340–247 across 587 matches, translating to a win rate of 57.92%. On hard courts his record stands at 171–133 (56.25%), while on clay he holds a 88–63 (58.28%) mark. On grass the numbers read 49–26 (65.33%) , and on carpet 32–25 (56.14%). Throughout his career he has won 4 titles (1 hard, 1 grass, 2 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 16–62 (20.51%).

🇬🇧Tim Henman, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 496–274 from 770 matches (64.42% win rate). His hard-court record is 270–147 (64.75%), on clay he stands at 63–56 (52.94%), and on grass he has gone 84–34 (71.19%) , with a carpet record of 79–37 (68.10%). He has accumulated 11 titles in total (8 hard, 3 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 34–58 (36.96%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 2 times, the record is tied 1–1 (50.00% each). The clay record between them sits at 1–0 (100.00% for Tim Henman) across 1 matches. On grass, their 3 encounters have yielded a record of 2–1 (66.67% for Sebastien Grosjean).

Dateâ–¼
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2003-10-27Paris MastersCarpetR3231🇬🇧Tim Henman11🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean (7)3-6 6-4 7-531421559.8%67.3%54.1%3/7
2003-06-23WimbledonGrassQF14🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean (13)29🇬🇧Tim Henman (10)7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 6-4519412155.6%75.4%52.7%6/11
2003-06-09Queen's ClubGrassSF20🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean (6)26🇬🇧Tim Henman (7)6-3 6-43935152.0%76.9%50.0%5/6
2003-05-12Hamburg MastersClayR3227🇬🇧Tim Henman15🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean (10)6-0 3-6 6-231152364.0%75.0%51.9%4/5
2000-03-13Indian Wells MastersHardR3219🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean9🇬🇧Tim Henman (11)6-3 3-6 7-531191068.2%65.0%60.7%4/7
2000-01-17Australian OpenHardR3213🇬🇧Tim Henman (11)26🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean6-1 6-4 4-6 7-6(6)516313264.2%73.9%38.8%11/15
1999-06-21WimbledonGrassR326🇬🇧Tim Henman (6)30🇫🇷Sebastien Grosjean6-1 6-7(8) 6-3 6-251688365.7%84.1%43.5%6/8

Wins

Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman
3–4Overall
1–2Grand Slam
1–2Masters 1000
1–0ATP 250
1–1Hard
0–1Clay
2–1Grass
0–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

50.0%2
50.0%2
Bo3
33.3%1
66.7%2
Bo5
100.0%1
0.0%0
2 Sets
33.3%1
66.7%2
3 Sets
33.3%1
66.7%2
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

Deciding

33.3%1
66.7%2
Decider Set
33.3%1
66.7%2
Tiebreak Wins
100.0%1
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

Sets

47.8%11
52.2%12
All
41.7%5
58.3%7
Grand Slam
44.4%4
55.6%5
Masters 1000
42.9%3
57.1%4
Hard
60.0%6
40.0%4
Grass
33.3%1
66.7%2
Clay
33.3%1
66.7%2
Carpet
Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

Games

46.6%103
53.4%118
All
44.1%52
55.9%66
Grand Slam
46.4%39
53.6%45
Masters 1000
47.1%33
52.9%37
Hard
48.5%47
51.5%50
Grass
34.8%8
65.2%15
Clay
48.4%15
51.6%16
Carpet
Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

Overview

By Surface

Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

By Tournament Level

Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

By Round

Sebastien Grosjean
Tim Henman

By Opponent Ranking

Sebastien GrosjeanTim Henman
33.3%2-4
vs Top 1
5.9%1-16
22.5%9-31
vs Top 5
31.6%18-39
20.5%16-62
vs Top 10
37%34-58
29%38-93
vs Top 20
45.7%80-95
53.8%258-222
vs Top 100
59.8%363-244
75.7%78-25
vs +100
81.1%129-30
31.4%61-133
vs Higher
44%81-103
70.7%275-114
vs Lower
70.6%411-171

Opponent Breakdown

Sebastien GrosjeanTim Henman
50.4%119-117
Vs Younger
62.2%262-159
63%221-130
Vs Older
66.8%231-115
57.1%296-222
Vs Right-Handed
62.7%406-242
63.2%43-25
Vs Left-Handed
73.8%90-32
49.6%130-132
Vs 2H Backhand
58.3%176-126
56.3%98-76
Vs 1H Backhand
63.6%117-67
73.1%19-7
Vs Shorter
69.1%224-100
57.6%302-222
Vs Taller
60.2%168-111

Pressure Situations