Site logo

Lleyton Hewitt vs Thomas Enqvist Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Lleyton Hewitt seasons:20162015201420132012
Thomas Enqvist seasons:20052004200320022001
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Lleyton Hewitt
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Thomas Enqvist
Age: 45y 154d (1981-02-24)
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
(1974-03-13) Age: 52y 137d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
6 - 1
Wins: 85.7% - 14.3%
Hard 5–1Clay 1–0Grass 0–0
250 1–1Masters 1000 2–0500 1–0Slam 1–0Davis Cup 1–0
WWWWW
LLLLL

H2H Preview

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt and πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist have met 7 times. Lleyton Hewitt currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–1.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt has compiled an overall career record of 616–262 across 878 matches, translating to a win rate of 70.16%. On hard courts his record stands at 372–158 (70.19%), while on clay he holds a 98–57 (63.23%) mark. On grass the numbers read 129–41 (75.88%) , and on carpet 17–6 (73.91%). Throughout his career he has won 30 titles (20 hard, 2 clay, 8 grass). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 65–73 (47.10%).

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 448–297 from 745 matches (60.13% win rate). His hard-court record is 294–162 (64.47%), on clay he stands at 58–63 (47.93%), and on grass he has gone 20–21 (48.78%) , with a carpet record of 76–51 (59.84%). He has accumulated 19 titles in total (13 hard, 2 clay, 4 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 41–63 (39.42%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 6 times, with Lleyton Hewitt leading 5–1 (83.33%). The clay record between them sits at 1–0 (100.00% for Lleyton Hewitt) across 1 matches.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2003-04-04Davis Cup WG QF: SWE vs AUSHardRR1πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt86πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-4 6-2 5-7 6-45------0/0
2002-03-11Indian Wells MastersHardQF1πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (1)22πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-4 6-43909158.0%82.8%76.2%0/0
2000-08-28US OpenHardR169πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (9)5πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (7)6-3 6-2 6-451079263.2%81.3%60.7%4/4
2000-08-14IndianapolisHardQF9πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (5)6πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (4)6-3 6-33827448.1%76.9%57.1%1/2
2000-05-08Rome MastersClayR1612πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (9)9πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (7)7-6(6) 2-6 6-3314211652.3%64.3%62.7%7/10
2000-01-03AdelaideHardF25πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (6)4πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (1)3-6 6-3 6-23967441.7%86.7%61.9%3/4
1999-01-04AdelaideHardF22πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (2)100πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊLleyton Hewitt (WC)4-6 6-1 6-239016466.7%81.8%59.1%2/3

Wins

Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist
6–1Overall
1–0Grand Slam
2–0Masters 1000
1–0ATP 500
1–1ATP 250
1–0Davis Cup
5–1Hard
1–0Clay

Sets Format

80.0%4
20.0%1
Bo3
100.0%2
0.0%0
Bo5
100.0%2
0.0%0
2 Sets
75.0%3
25.0%1
3 Sets
100.0%1
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

Deciding

66.7%2
33.3%1
Decider Set
100.0%1
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

Sets

75.0%15
25.0%5
All
100.0%3
0.0%0
Grand Slam
80.0%4
20.0%1
Masters 1000
76.5%13
23.5%4
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
66.7%2
33.3%1
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

Games

55.9%104
44.1%82
All
66.7%18
33.3%9
Grand Slam
54.0%27
46.0%23
Masters 1000
57.1%89
42.9%67
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
50.0%15
50.0%15
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

Overview

By Surface

Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

By Tournament Level

Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

By Round

Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist

By Opponent Ranking

Lleyton HewittThomas Enqvist
0%0-18
vs Top 1
22.2%2-7
40.2%35-52
vs Top 5
33.3%18-36
47.1%65-73
vs Top 10
39.4%41-63
51.5%118-111
vs Top 20
43.8%77-99
65.9%470-243
vs Top 100
57.5%349-258
88.5%146-19
vs +100
71.7%99-39
48.2%122-131
vs Higher
44%110-140
79.2%494-130
vs Lower
68.4%338-156

Opponent Breakdown

Lleyton HewittThomas Enqvist
62.8%235-139
Vs Younger
58.1%172-124
75.6%381-123
Vs Older
61.5%276-173
69.1%530-237
Vs Right-Handed
59.4%376-257
77.3%85-25
Vs Left-Handed
64.3%72-40
67.4%317-153
Vs 2H Backhand
55%133-109
67.7%170-81
Vs 1H Backhand
48.6%70-74
78%64-18
Vs Shorter
61.3%338-213
69%516-232
Vs Taller
50.9%56-54

Pressure Situations