Site logo

Kim Warwick vs Roscoe Tanner Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Kim Warwick seasons:19881985198419831982
Roscoe Tanner seasons:19851984198319821981
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Kim Warwick
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Roscoe Tanner
Age: 73y 345d (1952-04-08)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1951-10-15) Age: 74y 155d
Hand: L
Backhand: nan
4 - 5
Wins: 44.4% - 55.6%
Hard 1–1Clay 2–2Grass 0–1
Others 4–3Slam 0–2
LWWLL
WLLWW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick and πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner have met 9 times. Roscoe Tanner currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 5–4.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick has compiled an overall career record of 295–271 across 566 matches, translating to a win rate of 52.12%. On hard courts his record stands at 57–59 (49.14%), while on clay he holds a 85–85 (50.00%) mark. On grass the numbers read 101–69 (59.41%) , and on carpet 52–58 (47.27%). Throughout his career he has won 3 titles (1 hard, 1 clay, 1 grass). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 10–37 (21.28%).

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 591–297 from 888 matches (66.55% win rate). His hard-court record is 190–93 (67.14%), on clay he stands at 100–59 (62.89%), and on grass he has gone 118–46 (71.95%) , with a carpet record of 183–99 (64.89%). He has accumulated 15 titles in total (4 hard, 3 clay, 2 grass, 6 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 37–73 (33.64%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 2 times, the record is tied 1–1 (50.00% each). The clay record between them sits at 2–2 (50.00% each) across 4 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Roscoe Tanner).

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1983-11-29Australian OpenGrassR12838πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner274πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick7-6 6-2 3-6 6-35------0/0
1982-08-10Carlsbad WCTHardQF24πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner57πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick4-6 6-3 7-63------0/0
1979-11-12TaipeiCarpetQF53πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick (7)4πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (1)6-4 7-63------0/0
1977-10-31TokyoClayQF49πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick14πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (3)6-1 4-6 6-33------0/0
1976-11-01TokyoClayR1611πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (1)70πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick6-0 6-13------0/0
1976-10-18Sydney-1HardR3283πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick11πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (2)7-6 3-6 6-03------0/0
1976-09-01US OpenClayR3211πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (11)80πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick6-2 6-43------0/0
1976-03-09Memphis WCTCarpetR1611πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner (3)69πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(0)3------0/0
1974-10-07Tokyo-2ClayQF67πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊKim Warwick16πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈRoscoe Tanner6-2 6-33------0/0

Wins

Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner
4–5Overall
0–2Grand Slam
4–3Others
1–1Hard
2–2Clay
0–1Grass
1–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

50.0%4
50.0%4
Bo3
0.0%0
100.0%1
Bo5
50.0%2
50.0%2
2 Sets
50.0%2
50.0%2
3 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%1
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

Deciding

50.0%2
50.0%2
Decider Set
40.0%2
60.0%3
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

Sets

45.8%11
54.2%13
All
16.7%1
83.3%5
Grand Slam
0.0%0
0.0%0
Masters 1000
50.0%3
50.0%3
Hard
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grass
44.4%4
55.6%5
Clay
60.0%3
40.0%2
Carpet
Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

Games

48.3%111
51.7%119
All
40.4%23
59.6%34
Grand Slam
0.0%0
0.0%0
Masters 1000
51.7%31
48.3%29
Hard
43.6%17
56.4%22
Grass
47.3%35
52.7%39
Clay
49.1%28
50.9%29
Carpet
Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

Overview

By Surface

Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

By Tournament Level

Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

By Round

Kim Warwick
Roscoe Tanner

By Opponent Ranking

Kim WarwickRoscoe Tanner
0%0-4
vs Top 1
25%6-18
13%3-20
vs Top 5
24.6%16-49
21.3%10-37
vs Top 10
33.6%37-73
31.5%29-63
vs Top 20
39.8%72-109
41.3%130-185
vs Top 100
61.3%342-216
71.3%119-48
vs +100
86.5%166-26
40.4%86-127
vs Higher
34.2%51-98
60.5%161-105
vs Lower
76.2%457-143

Opponent Breakdown

Kim WarwickRoscoe Tanner
50.6%128-125
Vs Younger
64.3%274-152
47.6%131-144
Vs Older
67.9%302-143
51.1%233-223
Vs Right-Handed
66.8%516-256
47.2%42-47
Vs Left-Handed
63.7%72-41
22.2%2-7
Vs 2H Backhand
21.6%8-29
31.4%11-24
Vs 1H Backhand
51.3%40-38
36.3%61-107
Vs Shorter
59.3%178-122
55.2%74-60
Vs Taller
64.4%159-88

Pressure Situations