Site logo

Jim Courier vs Todd Martin Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Courier seasons:20001999199819971996
Todd Martin seasons:20042003200220012000
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Courier
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Todd Martin
Age: 55y 214d (1970-08-17)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1970-07-08) Age: 55y 254d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
6 - 1
Wins: 85.7% - 14.3%
Hard 3–1Clay 2–0Grass 1–0
Slam 2–1500 3–0Masters 1000 1–0
WWWWL
LLLLW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier and πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin have met 7 times. Jim Courier currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–1.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506–237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295–123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115–53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28–17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68–44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53–73 (42.06%).

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 410–234 from 644 matches (63.66% win rate). His hard-court record is 231–127 (64.53%), on clay he stands at 66–49 (57.39%), and on grass he has gone 61–23 (72.62%) , with a carpet record of 52–35 (59.77%). He has accumulated 8 titles in total (5 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 34–85 (28.57%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 4 times, with Jim Courier leading 3–1 (75.00%). The clay record between them sits at 2–0 (100.00% for Jim Courier) across 2 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Jim Courier).

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1997-08-25US OpenHardR12862πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin25πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier3-6 6-3 6-4 6-2512511358.9%79.5%52.9%4/6
1996-04-15BarcelonaClayQF9πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)17πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin (8)6-3 7-6(4)3991355.7%71.8%61.3%2/4
1993-06-21WimbledonGrassQF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)30πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin6-2 7-6(5) 6-35-2552.0%83.0%57.1%2/2
1993-03-01Indian Wells MastersHardR161πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)58πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin (WC)7-5 6-23936162.1%65.9%64.0%6/7
1993-02-08MemphisHardF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)96πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(4)316310369.4%72.0%51.5%0/4
1992-08-17IndianapolisHardSF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)125πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin7-6(5) 7-6(4)31517258.9%73.2%51.3%6/8
1991-05-27Roland GarrosClayR169πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (9)243πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈTodd Martin (Q)6-2 6-3 6-351174263.2%77.1%57.1%1/2

Wins

Jim Courier
Todd Martin
6–1Overall
2–1Grand Slam
1–0Masters 1000
3–0ATP 500
3–1Hard
2–0Clay
1–0Grass

Sets Format

100.0%4
0.0%0
Bo3
66.7%2
33.3%1
Bo5
100.0%3
0.0%0
2 Sets
100.0%3
0.0%0
3 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%1
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jim Courier
Todd Martin

Deciding

100.0%1
0.0%0
Decider Set
100.0%4
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Jim Courier
Todd Martin

Sets

78.9%15
21.1%4
All
70.0%7
30.0%3
Grand Slam
100.0%2
0.0%0
Masters 1000
63.6%7
36.4%4
Hard
100.0%3
0.0%0
Grass
100.0%5
0.0%0
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Jim Courier
Todd Martin

Games

56.1%111
43.9%87
All
56.5%52
43.5%40
Grand Slam
65.0%13
35.0%7
Masters 1000
50.8%61
49.2%59
Hard
63.3%19
36.7%11
Grass
64.6%31
35.4%17
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Jim Courier
Todd Martin

Overview

By Surface

Jim Courier
Todd Martin

By Tournament Level

Jim Courier
Todd Martin

By Round

Jim Courier
Todd Martin

By Opponent Ranking

Jim CourierTodd Martin
35.7%5-9
vs Top 1
9.5%2-19
37.1%26-44
vs Top 5
23.5%16-52
42.1%53-73
vs Top 10
28.6%34-85
49.2%95-98
vs Top 20
35.4%63-115
64.5%379-209
vs Top 100
58.7%296-208
81.6%124-28
vs +100
81.3%113-26
43.5%77-100
vs Higher
44.7%117-145
75.7%426-137
vs Lower
76.6%292-89

Opponent Breakdown

Jim CourierTodd Martin
62.7%197-117
Vs Younger
60.2%230-152
72%308-120
Vs Older
68.6%179-82
66.3%402-204
Vs Right-Handed
61.6%335-209
75.9%104-33
Vs Left-Handed
75%75-25
66.2%102-52
Vs 2H Backhand
54.4%99-83
47.5%56-62
Vs 1H Backhand
45.9%62-73
71.4%222-89
Vs Shorter
63.3%404-234
65.5%192-101
Vs Taller
100%3-0

Pressure Situations