Site logo

Jim Courier vs Thomas Enqvist Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Courier seasons:20001999199819971996
Thomas Enqvist seasons:20052004200320022001
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Courier
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Thomas Enqvist
Age: 55y 215d (1970-08-17)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1974-03-13) Age: 52y 7d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
6 - 2
Wins: 75.0% - 25.0%
Hard 5–1Clay 0–0Grass 0–0
Slam 1–0Masters 1000 2–1250 2–0500 1–0Finals 0–1
WLWWL
LWLLW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier and πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist have met 8 times. Jim Courier currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506–237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295–123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115–53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28–17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68–44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53–73 (42.06%).

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 448–297 from 745 matches (60.13% win rate). His hard-court record is 294–162 (64.47%), on clay he stands at 58–63 (47.93%), and on grass he has gone 20–21 (48.78%) , with a carpet record of 76–51 (59.84%). He has accumulated 19 titles in total (13 hard, 2 clay, 4 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 41–63 (39.42%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 6 times, with Jim Courier leading 5–1 (83.33%).

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2000-03-20Miami MastersHardR647πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (7)60πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-7(5) 6-3 6-4312213355.1%79.6%70.0%2/3
1999-11-01Paris MastersCarpetR1639πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier9πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-531478760.8%77.2%51.0%12/14
1997-07-21Los AngelesHardF29πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (6)8πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (2)6-4 6-43875358.5%83.9%40.9%1/3
1995-11-14ATP World Tour ChampionshipsCarpetRR8πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-3 6-236910159.6%89.3%63.2%1/1
1995-04-10Tokyo OutdoorHardQF15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)20πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (5)7-6(4) 6-037511166.0%80.6%68.8%0/1
1995-01-02AdelaideHardQF13πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)59πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-2 6-43682167.9%73.7%50.0%1/2
1994-07-25Canada MastersHardQF12πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)49πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-2 6-235610264.3%88.9%60.0%0/0
1992-01-13Australian OpenHardR642πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)190πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (Q)2-6 6-3 6-1 6-451647457.7%66.1%63.4%5/8

Wins

Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist
6–2Overall
1–0Grand Slam
2–1Masters 1000
1–0ATP 500
2–0ATP 250
0–1Tour Finals
5–1Hard
1–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

71.4%5
28.6%2
Bo3
100.0%1
0.0%0
Bo5
80.0%4
20.0%1
2 Sets
50.0%1
50.0%1
3 Sets
100.0%1
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

Deciding

50.0%1
50.0%1
Decider Set
66.7%2
33.3%1
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

Sets

70.0%14
30.0%6
All
75.0%3
25.0%1
Grand Slam
62.5%5
37.5%3
Masters 1000
80.0%12
20.0%3
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
40.0%2
60.0%3
Carpet
Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

Games

55.7%108
44.3%86
All
58.8%20
41.2%14
Grand Slam
53.5%46
46.5%40
Masters 1000
59.7%83
40.3%56
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
45.5%25
54.5%30
Carpet
Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

Overview

By Surface

Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

By Tournament Level

Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

By Round

Jim Courier
Thomas Enqvist

By Opponent Ranking

Jim CourierThomas Enqvist
35.7%5-9
vs Top 1
22.2%2-7
37.1%26-44
vs Top 5
33.3%18-36
42.1%53-73
vs Top 10
39.4%41-63
49.2%95-98
vs Top 20
43.8%77-99
64.5%379-209
vs Top 100
57.5%349-258
81.6%124-28
vs +100
71.7%99-39
43.5%77-100
vs Higher
44%110-140
75.7%426-137
vs Lower
68.4%338-156

Opponent Breakdown

Jim CourierThomas Enqvist
62.7%197-117
Vs Younger
58.1%172-124
72%308-120
Vs Older
61.5%276-173
66.3%402-204
Vs Right-Handed
59.4%376-257
75.9%104-33
Vs Left-Handed
64.3%72-40
66.2%102-52
Vs 2H Backhand
55%133-109
47.5%56-62
Vs 1H Backhand
48.6%70-74
71.4%222-89
Vs Shorter
61.3%338-213
65.5%192-101
Vs Taller
50.9%56-54

Pressure Situations