Site logo

Jim Courier vs Stefan Edberg Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Courier seasons:20001999199819971996
Stefan Edberg seasons:19961995199419931992
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Courier
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Stefan Edberg
Age: 55y 214d (1970-08-17)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1966-01-19) Age: 60y 59d
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
6 - 4
Wins: 60.0% - 40.0%
Hard 4–3Clay 1–0Grass 1–0
Others 1–1Masters 1000 0–1Slam 4–2250 1–0
LWWWW
WLLLL

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier and πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg have built a notable rivalry on the ATP Tour, having clashed 10 times. Jim Courier currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 6–4.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506–237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295–123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115–53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28–17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68–44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53–73 (42.06%).

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 801–270 from 1071 matches (74.79% win rate). His hard-court record is 382–104 (78.60%), on clay he stands at 138–64 (68.32%), and on grass he has gone 99–27 (78.57%) , with a carpet record of 182–75 (70.82%). He has accumulated 41 titles in total (22 hard, 3 clay, 5 grass, 11 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 98–114 (46.23%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 7 times, with Jim Courier leading 4–3 (57.14%). The clay record between them sits at 1–0 (100.00% for Jim Courier) across 1 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Jim Courier).

At the Grand Slam level β€” where the best-of-five format adds an extra layer of physical and mental endurance β€” the two have crossed paths 6 times, producing a Slam record of 4–2 in favour of Jim Courier. These matches, often played in front of the largest tennis audiences, frequently prove decisive in shaping the broader narrative of a rivalry.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1995-02-27ScottsdaleHardSF13πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)15πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (3)6-4 6-7(5) 6-431435852.8%66.2%48.3%7/11
1993-06-21WimbledonGrassSF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)3πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (2)4-6 6-4 6-2 6-45-5557.9%78.6%45.1%2/6
1993-01-18Australian OpenHardF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)2πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (2)6-2 6-1 2-6 7-55-2180.5%77.1%35.3%2/2
1992-01-13Australian OpenHardF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)1πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (1)6-3 3-6 6-4 6-251742270.5%64.0%69.4%10/12
1991-08-26US OpenHardF2πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (2)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)6-2 6-4 6-051242160.6%82.5%69.2%3/3
1991-05-27Roland GarrosClayQF9πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (9)1πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (1)6-4 2-6 6-3 6-451750470.5%73.3%38.9%3/6
1991-01-14Australian OpenHardR161πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (1)23πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (16)4-6 6-0 6-4 5-7 6-252109770.4%73.1%44.0%14/16
1990-03-05Indian Wells MastersHardSF3πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg22πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-4 6-13------0/0
1989-11-06StockholmCarpetQF3πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (3)28πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (11)3-6 6-3 6-43------0/0
1989-10-03BaselHardF35πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier3πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺStefan Edberg (1)7-6 3-6 2-6 6-0 7-55------0/0

Wins

Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg
6–4Overall
4–2Grand Slam
0–1Masters 1000
1–0ATP 250
1–1Others
4–3Hard
1–0Clay
1–0Grass
0–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

33.3%1
66.7%2
Bo3
71.4%5
28.6%2
Bo5
0.0%0
100.0%1
2 Sets
33.3%1
66.7%2
3 Sets
100.0%4
0.0%0
4 Sets
50.0%1
50.0%1
5 Sets
Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

Deciding

50.0%2
50.0%2
Decider Set
100.0%2
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
100.0%1
After 3 hours
Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

Sets

54.1%20
45.9%17
All
58.3%14
41.7%10
Grand Slam
0.0%0
100.0%2
Masters 1000
50.0%13
50.0%13
Hard
75.0%3
25.0%1
Grass
75.0%3
25.0%1
Clay
33.3%1
66.7%2
Carpet
Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

Games

49.7%170
50.3%172
All
50.5%109
49.5%107
Grand Slam
29.4%5
70.6%12
Masters 1000
48.1%115
51.9%124
Hard
57.9%22
42.1%16
Grass
54.1%20
45.9%17
Clay
46.4%13
53.6%15
Carpet
Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

H2H Series Progression

HardClayGrassCarpet

Overview

By Surface

Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

By Tournament Level

Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

By Round

Jim Courier
Stefan Edberg

By Opponent Ranking

Jim CourierStefan Edberg
35.7%5-9
vs Top 1
37.5%9-15
37.1%26-44
vs Top 5
40.2%49-73
42.1%53-73
vs Top 10
46.2%98-114
49.2%95-98
vs Top 20
53.1%180-159
64.5%379-209
vs Top 100
71.3%600-242
81.6%124-28
vs +100
87.8%201-28
43.5%77-100
vs Higher
43.1%62-82
75.7%426-137
vs Lower
79.8%739-187

Opponent Breakdown

Jim CourierStefan Edberg
62.7%197-117
Vs Younger
69.2%359-160
72%308-120
Vs Older
80%441-110
66.3%402-204
Vs Right-Handed
75.6%681-220
75.9%104-33
Vs Left-Handed
70.4%119-50
66.2%102-52
Vs 2H Backhand
61.4%81-51
47.5%56-62
Vs 1H Backhand
67.4%95-46
71.4%222-89
Vs Shorter
79.6%511-131
65.5%192-101
Vs Taller
61%164-105

Pressure Situations