Site logo

Jim Courier vs Michael Chang Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jim Courier seasons:20001999199819971996
Michael Chang seasons:20032002200120001999
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jim Courier
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Michael Chang
Age: 55y 214d (1970-08-17)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1972-02-22) Age: 54y 25d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
12 - 12
Wins: 50.0% - 50.0%
Hard 8–7Clay 2–0Grass 0–0
Others 0–2Masters 1000 4–3250 3–3500 3–2Finals 1–2Slam 1–0
LLWLW
WWLWL

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier and πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang have built a notable rivalry on the ATP Tour, having clashed 24 times. The series is tied 12–12.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier has compiled an overall career record of 506–237 across 743 matches, translating to a win rate of 68.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 295–123 (70.57%), while on clay he holds a 115–53 (68.45%) mark. On grass the numbers read 28–17 (62.22%) , and on carpet 68–44 (60.71%). Throughout his career he has won 23 titles (17 hard, 5 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 53–73 (42.06%).

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 662–312 from 974 matches (67.97% win rate). His hard-court record is 415–173 (70.58%), on clay he stands at 107–58 (64.85%), and on grass he has gone 30–25 (54.55%) , with a carpet record of 110–56 (66.27%). He has accumulated 34 titles in total (22 hard, 4 clay, 8 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 51–94 (35.17%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 15 times, with Jim Courier leading 8–7 (53.33%). The clay record between them sits at 2–0 (100.00% for Jim Courier) across 2 matches.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
1999-02-15MemphisHardR3269πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (WC)27πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)6-4 7-6(8)31116162.9%75.0%50.0%1/3
1998-07-20WashingtonHardQF19πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (1)47πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (7)6-3 6-43884155.2%87.5%57.7%0/1
1998-04-20OrlandoClayF57πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)12πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (1)7-5 3-6 7-531643464.8%77.1%44.7%7/9
1996-10-21Stuttgart MastersCarpetR162πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (2)15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (15)7-5 6-23978061.4%77.1%72.7%2/2
1995-11-14ATP World Tour ChampionshipsCarpetRR4πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-2 7-539411054.4%67.6%54.8%2/4
1995-10-30Paris MastersCarpetQF7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (6)4πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)6-2 7-6(5)3963163.4%68.9%61.5%6/7
1995-08-28US OpenHardQF15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (14)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (5)7-6(5) 7-6(3) 7-55-9564.3%64.1%54.9%10/15
1995-08-07Cincinnati MastersHardQF5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (11)3-6 7-6(6) 7-5318420646.6%83.3%43.6%8/13
1995-04-17Hong KongHardSF8πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (1)12πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)6-4 6-23882062.3%72.7%55.0%1/2
1995-04-10Tokyo OutdoorHardSF15πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (2)6-4 7-53904164.6%81.0%56.5%1/1
1995-02-06San JoseHardSF6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (2)11πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (3)4-6 7-6(5) 6-431347157.3%69.1%53.7%2/6
1994-02-14PhiladelphiaCarpetSF9πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)3πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)7-6(6) 6-231023255.7%76.9%58.1%3/4
1993-11-15ATP Tour World ChampionshipsCarpetRR7πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier6-4 6-03903347.2%68.0%71.4%5/5
1993-05-10Rome MastersClaySF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)10πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (6)6-2 6-7(2) 6-031564163.4%73.1%60.0%3/3
1993-04-12Hong KongHardSF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)9πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)6-2 6-33935057.9%75.8%62.5%3/3
1993-03-01Indian Wells MastersHardSF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)6-4 6-431187148.4%67.7%48.5%5/8
1992-11-16ATP Tour World ChampionshipsCarpetRR1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier5πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang7-5 6-2311910176.6%75.0%50.0%10/10
1992-04-13Hong KongHardF1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (3)7-5 6-331098351.4%81.1%48.6%5/6
1992-04-06Tokyo OutdoorHardSF2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)6πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)6-2 6-33804250.0%90.0%75.0%1/1
1992-03-13Miami MastersHardSF9πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (6)1πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6-2 6-43801169.6%78.1%85.7%0/0
1992-02-03San FranciscoHardF16πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (2)2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (1)6-3 6-33984261.5%75.0%65.0%2/3
1991-12-10Grand Slam CupCarpetR1615πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang2πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (2)6-4 6-23866551.6%84.4%60.0%0/0
1991-08-05Cincinnati MastersHardR165πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (4)24πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (13)7-5 6-23917070.4%84.2%62.5%0/0
1989-08-14CincinnatiHardR166πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈMichael Chang (4)35πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJim Courier (14)6-3 6-33------0/0

Wins

Jim Courier
Michael Chang
12–12Overall
1–0Grand Slam
4–3Masters 1000
3–2ATP 500
3–3ATP 250
0–2Others
1–2Tour Finals
8–7Hard
2–0Clay
2–5Indoor Hard

Sets Format

47.8%11
52.2%12
Bo3
100.0%1
0.0%0
Bo5
47.4%9
52.6%10
2 Sets
60.0%3
40.0%2
3 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jim Courier
Michael Chang

Deciding

50.0%2
50.0%2
Decider Set
57.1%4
42.9%3
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
100.0%1
After 3 hours
Jim Courier
Michael Chang

Sets

50.9%27
49.1%26
All
100.0%3
0.0%0
Grand Slam
56.3%9
43.8%7
Masters 1000
57.6%19
42.4%14
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
66.7%4
33.3%2
Clay
28.6%4
71.4%10
Carpet
Jim Courier
Michael Chang

Games

50.0%266
50.0%266
All
55.3%21
44.7%17
Grand Slam
53.8%86
46.3%74
Masters 1000
51.5%173
48.5%163
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
58.3%35
41.7%25
Clay
42.6%58
57.4%78
Carpet
Jim Courier
Michael Chang

H2H Series Progression

HardClayGrassCarpet

Overview

By Surface

Jim Courier
Michael Chang

By Tournament Level

Jim Courier
Michael Chang

By Round

Jim Courier
Michael Chang

By Opponent Ranking

Jim CourierMichael Chang
35.7%5-9
vs Top 1
25%7-21
37.1%26-44
vs Top 5
31.6%30-65
42.1%53-73
vs Top 10
35.2%51-94
49.2%95-98
vs Top 20
40.3%94-139
64.5%379-209
vs Top 100
62.3%475-288
81.6%124-28
vs +100
88.4%183-24
43.5%77-100
vs Higher
37.3%76-128
75.7%426-137
vs Lower
76.1%582-183

Opponent Breakdown

Jim CourierMichael Chang
62.7%197-117
Vs Younger
62.6%196-117
72%308-120
Vs Older
70.5%466-195
66.3%402-204
Vs Right-Handed
66.6%524-263
75.9%104-33
Vs Left-Handed
73.7%137-49
66.2%102-52
Vs 2H Backhand
56%98-77
47.5%56-62
Vs 1H Backhand
53.1%86-76
71.4%222-89
Vs Shorter
77.1%27-8
65.5%192-101
Vs Taller
67.4%590-286

Pressure Situations