Site logo

Jeff Borowiak vs Pierre Barthes Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jeff Borowiak seasons:19841983198219811980
Pierre Barthes seasons:19771976197519741973
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jeff Borowiak
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· Pierre Barthes
Age: 76y 306d (1949-09-25)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1941-09-13) Age: 84y 318d
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
0 - 0
Wins: 0.0% - 0.0%
Hard 0–0Clay 0–0Grass 0–0

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJeff Borowiak and πŸ‡«πŸ‡·Pierre Barthes have not met yet. The series is tied 0–0.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJeff Borowiak has compiled an overall career record of 288–304 across 592 matches, translating to a win rate of 48.65%. On hard courts his record stands at 83–84 (49.70%), while on clay he holds a 97–90 (51.87%) mark. On grass the numbers read 33–42 (44.00%) , and on carpet 75–88 (46.01%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 3 clay, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 10–52 (16.13%).

πŸ‡«πŸ‡·Pierre Barthes, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 191–187 from 378 matches (50.53% win rate). His hard-court record is 33–40 (45.21%), on clay he stands at 77–60 (56.20%), and on grass he has gone 41–32 (56.16%) , with a carpet record of 40–55 (42.11%). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 2–2 (50.00%).

No matches found.

Overview

By Surface

Jeff Borowiak
Pierre Barthes

By Tournament Level

Jeff Borowiak
Pierre Barthes

By Round

Jeff Borowiak
Pierre Barthes

By Opponent Ranking

Jeff BorowiakPierre Barthes
11.1%1-8
vs Top 1
50%1-1
11.4%4-31
vs Top 5
66.7%2-1
16.1%10-52
vs Top 10
50%2-2
24.4%29-90
vs Top 20
37.5%3-5
40.6%126-184
vs Top 100
26.7%8-22
73.9%88-31
vs +100
58.3%7-5
35.1%81-150
vs Higher
24.1%7-22
67.2%133-65
vs Lower
61.5%8-5

Opponent Breakdown

Jeff BorowiakPierre Barthes
52.3%162-148
Vs Younger
53.6%140-121
41.8%112-156
Vs Older
36%36-64
51%248-238
Vs Right-Handed
52.1%160-147
34.7%34-64
Vs Left-Handed
39.4%26-40
35.3%6-11
Vs 2H Backhand
0%0-3
32.8%22-45
Vs 1H Backhand
34.5%10-19
41.3%157-223
Vs Shorter
β€”
50%4-4
Vs Taller
β€”

Pressure Situations