Site logo

Jan-Michael Gambill vs Tim Henman Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jan-Michael Gambill seasons:20072006200520042003
Tim Henman seasons:20072006200520042003
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jan-Michael Gambill
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Tim Henman
Age: 48y 289d (1977-06-03)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1974-09-06) Age: 51y 194d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
3 - 4
Wins: 42.9% - 57.1%
Hard 3–3Clay 0–1Grass 0–0
500 1–0Masters 1000 1–3250 1–1
WLLLL
LWWWW

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill and πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman have met 7 times. Tim Henman currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 4–3.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill has compiled an overall career record of 201–196 across 397 matches, translating to a win rate of 50.63%. On hard courts his record stands at 163–128 (56.01%), while on clay he holds a 10–37 (21.28%) mark. On grass the numbers read 23–21 (52.27%) , and on carpet 5–10 (33.33%). Throughout his career he has won 3 titles (3 hard). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 13–38 (25.49%).

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 496–274 from 770 matches (64.42% win rate). His hard-court record is 270–147 (64.75%), on clay he stands at 63–56 (52.94%), and on grass he has gone 84–34 (71.19%) , with a carpet record of 79–37 (68.10%). He has accumulated 11 titles in total (8 hard, 3 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 34–58 (36.96%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 6 times, the record is tied 3–3 (50.00% each). The clay record between them sits at 1–0 (100.00% for Tim Henman) across 1 matches.

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2006-07-31WashingtonHardR1664πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (14)503πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill (LL)6-1 6-33737055.8%75.9%52.2%4/5
2003-05-12Hamburg MastersClayR6427πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman40πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill7-5 6-43894171.2%66.7%76.5%0/2
2003-03-10Indian Wells MastersHardR6413πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (13)35πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill7-5 6-23953365.0%84.6%52.4%1/1
2001-08-06Cincinnati MastersHardQF8πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (7)22πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill4-6 6-2 6-231432357.0%62.3%57.5%10/13
1999-11-08StockholmHardR1671πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill10πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (2)7-5 6-33789057.1%84.4%58.3%1/2
1998-10-26Stuttgart MastersHardR1650πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill9πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (9)7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(5)31346354.1%70.0%56.9%5/8
1998-04-13TokyoHardQF81πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill (11)15πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Tim Henman (3)6-3 4-6 6-331054554.3%62.0%54.8%8/12

Wins

Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman
3–4Overall
1–3Masters 1000
1–0ATP 500
1–1ATP 250
3–3Hard
0–1Clay

Sets Format

42.9%3
57.1%4
Bo3
0.0%0
0.0%0
Bo5
25.0%1
75.0%3
2 Sets
66.7%2
33.3%1
3 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

Deciding

66.7%2
33.3%1
Decider Set
100.0%1
0.0%0
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

Sets

41.2%7
58.8%10
All
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grand Slam
30.0%3
70.0%7
Masters 1000
46.7%7
53.3%8
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
0.0%0
100.0%2
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

Games

44.6%74
55.4%92
All
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grand Slam
40.6%41
59.4%60
Masters 1000
45.1%65
54.9%79
Hard
0.0%0
0.0%0
Grass
40.9%9
59.1%13
Clay
0.0%0
0.0%0
Carpet
Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

Overview

By Surface

Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

By Tournament Level

Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

By Round

Jan-Michael Gambill
Tim Henman

By Opponent Ranking

Jan-Michael GambillTim Henman
33.3%2-4
vs Top 1
5.9%1-16
13.6%3-19
vs Top 5
31.6%18-39
25.5%13-38
vs Top 10
37%34-58
27.4%23-61
vs Top 20
45.7%80-95
44.4%134-168
vs Top 100
59.8%363-244
70.5%67-28
vs +100
81.1%129-30
36.3%69-121
vs Higher
44%81-103
63.8%132-75
vs Lower
70.6%411-171

Opponent Breakdown

Jan-Michael GambillTim Henman
50.7%70-68
Vs Younger
62.2%262-159
50.6%131-128
Vs Older
66.8%231-115
49.7%171-173
Vs Right-Handed
62.7%406-242
56.6%30-23
Vs Left-Handed
73.8%90-32
42.2%65-89
Vs 2H Backhand
58.3%176-126
47.3%52-58
Vs 1H Backhand
63.6%117-67
50.2%146-145
Vs Shorter
69.1%224-100
49.1%26-27
Vs Taller
60.2%168-111

Pressure Situations