Site logo

Jan-Michael Gambill vs Thomas Enqvist Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jan-Michael Gambill seasons:20072006200520042003
Thomas Enqvist seasons:20052004200320022001
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Jan-Michael Gambill
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Thomas Enqvist
Age: 48y 309d (1977-06-03)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1974-03-13) Age: 52y 26d
Hand: R
Backhand: 2H
4 - 2
Wins: 66.7% - 33.3%
Hard 2–1Clay 0–0Grass 2–0
Slam 1–1250 2–1Masters 1000 1–0
WLWWW
LWLLL

H2H Preview

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill and πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist have met 6 times. Jan-Michael Gambill currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 4–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill has compiled an overall career record of 201–196 across 397 matches, translating to a win rate of 50.63%. On hard courts his record stands at 163–128 (56.01%), while on clay he holds a 10–37 (21.28%) mark. On grass the numbers read 23–21 (52.27%) , and on carpet 5–10 (33.33%). Throughout his career he has won 3 titles (3 hard). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 13–38 (25.49%).

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 448–297 from 745 matches (60.13% win rate). His hard-court record is 294–162 (64.47%), on clay he stands at 58–63 (47.93%), and on grass he has gone 20–21 (48.78%) , with a carpet record of 76–51 (59.84%). He has accumulated 19 titles in total (13 hard, 2 clay, 4 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 41–63 (39.42%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 3 times, with Jan-Michael Gambill leading 2–1 (66.67%). On grass, their 2 encounters have yielded a record of 2–0 (100.00% for Jan-Michael Gambill).

Dateβ–Ό
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2003-07-21IndianapolisHardR3239πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill (5)112πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist6-2 6-236013070.6%86.1%40.0%3/3
2003-06-09Queen's ClubGrassR6439πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill (10)104πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist7-6(5) 7-6(5)310112556.8%89.1%42.9%0/2
2001-03-19Miami MastersHardR3219πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill (19)14πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (14)7-5 6-7(7) 6-1313626660.4%80.3%50.0%6/9
2000-10-23BaselCarpetR326πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (2)29πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill7-6(14) 7-6(5)312112550.0%91.1%57.8%2/4
2000-06-26WimbledonGrassR1656πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill8πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist (9)7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 6-4516034851.2%87.3%56.7%4/5
1999-01-18Australian OpenHardR12821πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺThomas Enqvist38πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈJan-Michael Gambill6-3 7-6(5) 6-451207755.6%73.8%51.9%2/4

Wins

Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist
4–2Overall
1–1Grand Slam
1–0Masters 1000
2–1ATP 250
2–1Hard
2–0Grass
0–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

75.0%3
25.0%1
Bo3
50.0%1
50.0%1
Bo5
66.7%2
33.3%1
2 Sets
50.0%1
50.0%1
3 Sets
100.0%1
0.0%0
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

Deciding

100.0%1
0.0%0
Decider Set
60.0%3
40.0%2
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

Sets

56.3%9
43.8%7
All
42.9%3
57.1%4
Grand Slam
66.7%2
33.3%1
Masters 1000
50.0%4
50.0%4
Hard
83.3%5
16.7%1
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
0.0%0
100.0%2
Carpet
Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

Games

53.2%92
46.8%81
All
47.9%35
52.1%38
Grand Slam
59.4%19
40.6%13
Masters 1000
55.0%44
45.0%36
Hard
53.7%36
46.3%31
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
46.2%12
53.8%14
Carpet
Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

Overview

By Surface

Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

By Tournament Level

Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

By Round

Jan-Michael Gambill
Thomas Enqvist

By Opponent Ranking

Jan-Michael GambillThomas Enqvist
33.3%2-4
vs Top 1
22.2%2-7
13.6%3-19
vs Top 5
33.3%18-36
25.5%13-38
vs Top 10
39.4%41-63
27.4%23-61
vs Top 20
43.8%77-99
44.4%134-168
vs Top 100
57.5%349-258
70.5%67-28
vs +100
71.7%99-39
36.3%69-121
vs Higher
44%110-140
63.8%132-75
vs Lower
68.4%338-156

Opponent Breakdown

Jan-Michael GambillThomas Enqvist
50.7%70-68
Vs Younger
58.1%172-124
50.6%131-128
Vs Older
61.5%276-173
49.7%171-173
Vs Right-Handed
59.4%376-257
56.6%30-23
Vs Left-Handed
64.3%72-40
42.2%65-89
Vs 2H Backhand
55%133-109
47.3%52-58
Vs 1H Backhand
48.6%70-74
50.2%146-145
Vs Shorter
61.3%338-213
49.1%26-27
Vs Taller
50.9%56-54

Pressure Situations