Site logo

Cedric Pioline vs Tim Henman Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cedric Pioline seasons:20022001200019991998
Tim Henman seasons:20072006200520042003
🇫🇷 Cedric Pioline
🇬🇧 Tim Henman
Age: 56y 322d (1969-06-15)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1974-09-06) Age: 51y 239d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
2 - 4
Wins: 33.3% - 66.7%
Hard 1–2Clay 0–0Grass 0–1
500 1–1250 1–1Slam 0–1Masters 1000 0–1
WLWLL
LWLWW

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Cedric Pioline and 🇬🇧Tim Henman have met 6 times. Tim Henman currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 4–2.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Cedric Pioline has compiled an overall career record of 389–317 across 706 matches, translating to a win rate of 55.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 151–121 (55.51%), while on clay he holds a 118–102 (53.64%) mark. On grass the numbers read 45–30 (60.00%) , and on carpet 75–64 (53.96%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 25–67 (27.17%).

🇬🇧Tim Henman, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 496–274 from 770 matches (64.42% win rate). His hard-court record is 270–147 (64.75%), on clay he stands at 63–56 (52.94%), and on grass he has gone 84–34 (71.19%) , with a carpet record of 79–37 (68.10%). He has accumulated 11 titles in total (8 hard, 3 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 34–58 (36.96%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 3 times, with Tim Henman leading 2–1 (66.67%). On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Tim Henman).

Dateâ–¼
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2002-10-21BaselCarpetR326🇬🇧Tim Henman (1)120🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (Q)6-1 6-43586157.1%100.0%66.7%0/0
2001-03-12Indian Wells MastersHardR3210🇬🇧Tim Henman (10)20🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-3 6-33765254.4%71.0%61.5%4/6
2000-02-14RotterdamHardF15🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (8)11🇬🇧Tim Henman (5)6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(4)37313145.1%100.0%60.7%0/0
1999-06-21WimbledonGrassQF6🇬🇧Tim Henman (6)39🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-4 6-2 4-6 6-3515319660.2%89.6%52.9%3/4
1996-03-11CopenhagenCarpetSF32🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (3)64🇬🇧Tim Henman6-3 3-6 6-131076056.5%71.2%50.0%7/9
1995-08-14IndianapolisHardR64150🇬🇧Tim Henman (WC)44🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (16)6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(2)31543642.5%66.7%56.5%5/9

Wins

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman
2–4Overall
0–1Grand Slam
0–1Masters 1000
1–1ATP 500
1–1ATP 250
1–2Hard
0–1Grass
1–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

40.0%2
60.0%3
Bo3
0.0%0
100.0%1
Bo5
0.0%0
100.0%2
2 Sets
66.7%2
33.3%1
3 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%1
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Deciding

66.7%2
33.3%1
Decider Set
50.0%1
50.0%1
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Sets

35.3%6
64.7%11
All
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grand Slam
0.0%0
100.0%2
Masters 1000
37.5%3
62.5%5
Hard
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
40.0%2
60.0%3
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Games

45.2%76
54.8%92
All
40.5%15
59.5%22
Grand Slam
33.3%6
66.7%12
Masters 1000
46.1%41
53.9%48
Hard
40.5%15
59.5%22
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
47.6%20
52.4%22
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Overview

By Surface

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Tournament Level

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Round

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Opponent Ranking

Cedric PiolineTim Henman
12.5%1-7
vs Top 1
5.9%1-16
26.1%12-34
vs Top 5
31.6%18-39
27.2%25-67
vs Top 10
37%34-58
30.4%52-119
vs Top 20
45.7%80-95
51.8%298-277
vs Top 100
59.8%363-244
69.8%90-39
vs +100
81.1%129-30
39.4%100-154
vs Higher
44%81-103
64%288-162
vs Lower
70.6%411-171

Opponent Breakdown

Cedric PiolineTim Henman
55.6%267-213
Vs Younger
62.2%262-159
54%122-104
Vs Older
66.8%231-115
55.3%320-259
Vs Right-Handed
62.7%406-242
54.3%69-58
Vs Left-Handed
73.8%90-32
44.8%73-90
Vs 2H Backhand
58.3%176-126
46.2%54-63
Vs 1H Backhand
63.6%117-67
56.1%224-175
Vs Shorter
69.1%224-100
52.2%109-100
Vs Taller
60.2%168-111

Pressure Situations