Site logo

Cedric Pioline vs Tim Henman Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cedric Pioline seasons:20022001200019991998
Tim Henman seasons:20072006200520042003
🇫🇷 Cedric Pioline
🇬🇧 Tim Henman
Age: 56y 277d (1969-06-15)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1974-09-06) Age: 51y 194d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
2 - 4
Wins: 33.3% - 66.7%
Hard 1–2Clay 0–0Grass 0–1
500 11250 11Slam 01Masters 1000 01
WLWLL
LWLWW

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Cedric Pioline and 🇬🇧Tim Henman have met 6 times. Tim Henman currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 42.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Cedric Pioline has compiled an overall career record of 389317 across 706 matches, translating to a win rate of 55.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 151121 (55.51%), while on clay he holds a 118102 (53.64%) mark. On grass the numbers read 4530 (60.00%) , and on carpet 7564 (53.96%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 2567 (27.17%).

🇬🇧Tim Henman, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 496274 from 770 matches (64.42% win rate). His hard-court record is 270147 (64.75%), on clay he stands at 6356 (52.94%), and on grass he has gone 8434 (71.19%) , with a carpet record of 7937 (68.10%). He has accumulated 11 titles in total (8 hard, 3 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 3458 (36.96%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 3 times, with Tim Henman leading 21 (66.67%). On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 10 (100.00% for Tim Henman).

Date
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2002-10-21BaselCarpetR326🇬🇧Tim Henman (1)120🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (Q)6-1 6-43586157.1%100.0%66.7%0/0
2001-03-12Indian Wells MastersHardR3210🇬🇧Tim Henman (10)20🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-3 6-33765254.4%71.0%61.5%4/6
2000-02-14RotterdamHardF15🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (8)11🇬🇧Tim Henman (5)6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(4)37313145.1%100.0%60.7%0/0
1999-06-21WimbledonGrassQF6🇬🇧Tim Henman (6)39🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-4 6-2 4-6 6-3515319660.2%89.6%52.9%3/4
1996-03-11CopenhagenCarpetSF32🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (3)64🇬🇧Tim Henman6-3 3-6 6-131076056.5%71.2%50.0%7/9
1995-08-14IndianapolisHardR64150🇬🇧Tim Henman (WC)44🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (16)6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(2)31543642.5%66.7%56.5%5/9

Wins

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman
24Overall
01Grand Slam
01Masters 1000
11ATP 500
11ATP 250
12Hard
01Grass
11Indoor Hard

Sets Format

40.0%2
60.0%3
Bo3
0.0%0
100.0%1
Bo5
0.0%0
100.0%2
2 Sets
66.7%2
33.3%1
3 Sets
0.0%0
100.0%1
4 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
5 Sets
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Deciding

66.7%2
33.3%1
Decider Set
50.0%1
50.0%1
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Sets

35.3%6
64.7%11
All
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grand Slam
0.0%0
100.0%2
Masters 1000
37.5%3
62.5%5
Hard
25.0%1
75.0%3
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
40.0%2
60.0%3
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Games

45.2%76
54.8%92
All
40.5%15
59.5%22
Grand Slam
33.3%6
66.7%12
Masters 1000
46.1%41
53.9%48
Hard
40.5%15
59.5%22
Grass
0.0%0
0.0%0
Clay
47.6%20
52.4%22
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

Overview

By Surface

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Tournament Level

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Round

Cedric Pioline
Tim Henman

By Opponent Ranking

Cedric PiolineTim Henman
12.5%1-7
vs Top 1
5.9%1-16
26.1%12-34
vs Top 5
31.6%18-39
27.2%25-67
vs Top 10
37%34-58
30.4%52-119
vs Top 20
45.7%80-95
51.8%298-277
vs Top 100
59.8%363-244
69.8%90-39
vs +100
81.1%129-30
39.4%100-154
vs Higher
44%81-103
64%288-162
vs Lower
70.6%411-171

Opponent Breakdown

Cedric PiolineTim Henman
55.6%267-213
Vs Younger
62.2%262-159
54%122-104
Vs Older
66.8%231-115
55.3%320-259
Vs Right-Handed
62.7%406-242
54.3%69-58
Vs Left-Handed
73.8%90-32
44.8%73-90
Vs 2H Backhand
58.3%176-126
46.2%54-63
Vs 1H Backhand
63.6%117-67
56.1%224-175
Vs Shorter
69.1%224-100
52.2%109-100
Vs Taller
60.2%168-111

Pressure Situations