Site logo

Cedric Pioline vs Patrick Rafter Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cedric Pioline seasons:20022001200019991998
Patrick Rafter seasons:20012000199919981997
🇫🇷 Cedric Pioline
🇦🇺 Patrick Rafter
Age: 56y 322d (1969-06-15)
Hand: R
Backhand: nan
(1972-12-28) Age: 53y 126d
Hand: R
Backhand: 1H
3 - 4
Wins: 42.9% - 57.1%
Hard 1–1Clay 1–1Grass 0–1
Masters 1000 1–1Davis Cup 0–1500 0–1Others 0–1Slam 2–0
LLLWW
WWWLL

H2H Preview

🇫🇷Cedric Pioline and 🇦🇺Patrick Rafter have met 7 times. Patrick Rafter currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 4–3.

Looking at their individual career profiles, 🇫🇷Cedric Pioline has compiled an overall career record of 389–317 across 706 matches, translating to a win rate of 55.10%. On hard courts his record stands at 151–121 (55.51%), while on clay he holds a 118–102 (53.64%) mark. On grass the numbers read 45–30 (60.00%) , and on carpet 75–64 (53.96%). Throughout his career he has won 5 titles (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 25–67 (27.17%).

🇦🇺Patrick Rafter, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 358–191 from 549 matches (65.21% win rate). His hard-court record is 212–105 (66.88%), on clay he stands at 36–34 (51.43%), and on grass he has gone 74–25 (74.75%) , with a carpet record of 36–27 (57.14%). He has accumulated 11 titles in total (7 hard, 4 grass). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 35–49 (41.67%).

When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 2 times, the record is tied 1–1 (50.00% each). The clay record between them sits at 1–1 (50.00% each) across 2 matches. On grass, their 1 encounter has yielded a record of 1–0 (100.00% for Patrick Rafter).

Dateâ–¼
Tourney
Surface
Round
Wrk
Winner
Lrk
Loser
Score
BoF
Min
WA
WDF
W1stIn
W1st%
W2nd%
BPSvd
2000-05-29Roland GarrosClayR646🇫🇷Cedric Pioline (6)24🇦🇺Patrick Rafter7-6(5) 6-3 6-451414250.5%83.0%65.2%0/0
1999-08-30US OpenHardR12826🇫🇷Cedric Pioline4🇦🇺Patrick Rafter (4)4-6 4-6 6-3 7-5 1-0 RET51585661.0%81.3%47.9%5/8
1999-05-16World Team CupClayRR3🇦🇺Patrick Rafter29🇫🇷Cedric Pioline7-6(10) 6-131588058.1%78.7%65.9%2/4
1998-02-16AntwerpHardR163🇦🇺Patrick Rafter (2)18🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-4 7-6(2)3804159.4%63.2%73.1%0/2
1997-10-27Paris MastersCarpetR323🇦🇺Patrick Rafter (3)23🇫🇷Cedric Pioline6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-1313114563.2%73.0%51.2%4/5
1997-02-07Davis Cup WG R1: AUS vs FRAGrassRR64🇦🇺Patrick Rafter26🇫🇷Cedric Pioline3-6 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 6-45------0/0
1994-10-31Paris MastersCarpetR6443🇫🇷Cedric Pioline21🇦🇺Patrick Rafter6-4 6-23684060.9%78.6%77.8%0/0

Wins

Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter
3–4Overall
2–0Grand Slam
1–1Masters 1000
0–1ATP 500
0–1Others
0–1Davis Cup
1–1Hard
1–1Clay
0–1Grass
1–1Indoor Hard

Sets Format

25.0%1
75.0%3
Bo3
66.7%2
33.3%1
Bo5
33.3%1
66.7%2
2 Sets
50.0%1
50.0%1
3 Sets
0.0%0
0.0%0
4 Sets
50.0%1
50.0%1
5 Sets
Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

Deciding

33.3%1
66.7%2
Decider Set
20.0%1
80.0%4
Tiebreak Wins
0.0%0
0.0%0
After 3 hours
Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

Sets

50.0%11
50.0%11
All
75.0%6
25.0%2
Grand Slam
60.0%3
40.0%2
Masters 1000
42.9%3
57.1%4
Hard
40.0%2
60.0%3
Grass
60.0%3
40.0%2
Clay
60.0%3
40.0%2
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

Games

49.5%110
50.5%112
All
55.4%41
44.6%33
Grand Slam
51.0%26
49.0%25
Masters 1000
49.2%32
50.8%33
Hard
48.1%26
51.9%28
Grass
50.0%26
50.0%26
Clay
51.0%26
49.0%25
Carpet
Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

Overview

By Surface

Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

By Tournament Level

Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

By Round

Cedric Pioline
Patrick Rafter

By Opponent Ranking

Cedric PiolinePatrick Rafter
12.5%1-7
vs Top 1
26.7%4-11
26.1%12-34
vs Top 5
40.4%21-31
27.2%25-67
vs Top 10
41.7%35-49
30.4%52-119
vs Top 20
45.8%70-83
51.8%298-277
vs Top 100
60.6%255-166
69.8%90-39
vs +100
80%100-25
39.4%100-154
vs Higher
40.4%63-93
64%288-162
vs Lower
74.9%292-98

Opponent Breakdown

Cedric PiolinePatrick Rafter
55.6%267-213
Vs Younger
72.5%153-58
54%122-104
Vs Older
60.7%205-133
55.3%320-259
Vs Right-Handed
64.6%296-162
54.3%69-58
Vs Left-Handed
67.8%61-29
44.8%73-90
Vs 2H Backhand
60.2%100-66
46.2%54-63
Vs 1H Backhand
55.8%58-46
56.1%224-175
Vs Shorter
64%142-80
52.2%109-100
Vs Taller
64.7%143-78

Pressure Situations