Brett Steven vs Cedric Pioline Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis
H2H Preview
Brett Steven and
Cedric Pioline have met 5 times. Cedric Pioline currently holds the upper hand, leading the series 3–2.
Looking at their individual career profiles, Brett Steven has compiled an overall career record of 174–166 across 340 matches, translating to a win rate of 51.18%. On hard courts his record stands at 92–93 (49.73%), while on clay he holds a 14–20 (41.18%) mark. On grass the numbers read 35–23 (60.34%) , and on carpet 33–30 (52.38%). Against Top 10 opponents his record reads 8–21 (27.59%).
Cedric Pioline, on the other hand, enters this matchup with a career mark of 389–317 from 706 matches (55.10% win rate). His hard-court record is 151–121 (55.51%), on clay he stands at 118–102 (53.64%), and on grass he has gone 45–30 (60.00%) , with a carpet record of 75–64 (53.96%). He has accumulated 5 titles in total (1 hard, 2 clay, 1 grass, 1 carpet). Against Top 10 opponents his record stands at 25–67 (27.17%).
When it comes to their head-to-head meetings, the surface breakdown reveals this contrast. On hard courts they have met 1 times, with Cedric Pioline leading 1–0 (100.00%). On grass, their 2 encounters have yielded a record of 1–1 (50.00% each).
Date▼ | Tourney | Surface | Round | Wrk | Winner | Lrk | Loser | Score | BoF | Min | WA | WDF | W1stIn | W1st% | W2nd% | BPSvd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997-06-23 | Wimbledon | Grass | R16 | 44 | 104 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 | 5 | 154 | 16 | 4 | 68.9% | 80.6% | 50.0% | 6/9 | ||
| 1995-11-06 | Moscow | Carpet | R32 | 55 | 44 | 6-2 6-3 | 3 | 82 | 14 | 2 | 56.3% | 80.6% | 64.3% | 3/3 | ||
| 1994-06-20 | Wimbledon | Grass | R128 | 75 | 15 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-1 | 5 | 35 | 4 | 12 | 62.4% | 74.0% | 24.3% | 13/20 | ||
| 1993-12-07 | Grand Slam Cup | Carpet | R16 | 43 | 10 | 6-4 7-6 | 3 | 91 | 15 | 7 | 61.6% | 93.3% | 53.6% | 1/2 | ||
| 1993-08-09 | Cincinnati Masters | Hard | R64 | 17 | 40 | 6-3 6-3 | 3 | 76 | 3 | 2 | 64.6% | 87.1% | 64.7% | 2/2 |